Security Nat. Bank of Greensboro v. Hannah, 607

CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtMOORE
CitationSecurity Nat. Bank of Greensboro v. Hannah, 114 S.E.2d 273, 252 N.C. 556 (N.C. 1960)
Decision Date18 May 1960
Docket NumberNo. 607,607
PartiesSECURITY NATIONAL BANK OF GREENSBORO, In Its Own Right, and as Trustee Under the Will of Claude Kiser, Deceased, v. Jean Kiser HANNAH, Martha Jean Hannah, James Hunt Hannah, lll, a Minor, Mamie Ann Hannah, a Minor, Richard M. Kiser, And All Persons Not in Esse Who May Take Under the Will of Claude Kiser.

E. D. Kuykendall, Jr., Greensboro, as guardian ad litem and for Martha Jean Hannah, defendant-appellants.

York, Boyd & Flynn, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

Cooke & Cooke, Greensboro, for defendants Jean Kiser Hannah and Richard M. Kiser, appellees.

MOORE, Justice.

The time of termination of the trust is the sole question for decision on this appeal. The solution depends upon the proper interpretation of the first sentence in paragraph 12, Item Fifth, of the will, which reads as follows: 'When my youngest living grandchild becomes twenty-one years of age, the trust property then in the hands of the trustee shall be distributed.'

Appellees maintain that the trust terminates when the youngest grandchild of testator living at the time of his death reaches the age of twenty-one. On the other hand, appellants contend that the trust continues until the youngest grandchild, whenever born, reaches the age of twenty-one years.

The controlling objective of testamentary construction is the intent of the testator. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Schneider, 235 N.C. 446, 451, 70 S.E.2d 578. This intent is ordinarily to be ascertained from an examination of the will from its four corners. Bullock v. Bullock, 251 N.C. 559, 563-564, 111 S.E.2d 837.

From an examination of the will as a whole, it is evident that testator's wife and children were the primary objects of his bounty. The portion of the will involved here makes no direct gift to grandchildren or to any person other than testator's children. The sentence quoted above is only a 'measuring rod' for determination of the duration of the trust.

The possibility that Richard M. Kiser will have issue and that Jean Kiser Hannah will have other child or children will continue to exist so long as they live. The law presumes that the possibility of issue is not extinct until death. McPherson v. First & Citizens Nat. Bank, 240 N.C. 1, 9, 81 S.E.2d 386. Therefore, if the contention of appellants is correct, the trust must continue and the trust property may not be distributed until after the death of both of testator's children. Either or both may be survived by a child or children of tender years. In such case the property could not be distributed until the youngest of them arrives at the age of twenty-one. The construction urged by appellants would deprive testator's children of all except a small portion of the gift. They would each realize $50 per month for life, emergency help in case of illness and assistance in the college education of their children. When we consider that the trust property has a present value of approximately $350,000, it is apparent that testator's children would scarcely receive even the income from the trust estate.

We do not agree that such result is in accord with testator's intention. He declares in Item Fifth, paragraph 12, '* * * it is my desire that my daughter, Jean K. Hannah, and my son, Richard M. Kiser, shall share equally in my estate.' Directions are then given to the trustee for arriving at and making an equal distribution between them of the entire trust property at the termination of the trust. This language is used: 'Said share shall then (after computation so as to arrive at equality) be paid over to each of my said...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Sutton v. Sutton
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • April 4, 1978
    ...from an examination of the will from its four corners. Bullock v. Bullock, 251 N.C. 559, 563-4, 111 S.E.2d 837." Bank v. Hannah, 252 N.C. 556, 559, 114 S.E.2d 273, 276 (1960); McCain v. Womble, 265 N.C. 640, 144 S.E.2d 857 It is clear from the four corners of his will that Guy Sutton, Sr. m......
  • Clark v. Connor
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1960
    ...intention of the testator which is sought. Little v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 252 N.C. 229, 113 S.E.2d 689; Security Nat. Bank v. Hannah, 252 N.C. 556, 114 S.E.2d 273. Isolated clauses or sentences are not to be considered by themselves, but the will is to be considered as a whole, and it......
  • Hicks v. Hicks
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 8, 1963
    ...Barnes, 224 N.C. 702, 32 S.E.2d 224; McPherson v. First & Citizens Nat. Bank, 240 N.C. 1, 81 S.E.2d 386 and Security Nat. Bank of Greensboro v. Hannah, 252 N.C. 556, 114 S.E.2d 273. Ordinarily, the law presumes that the possibility of issue is not extinct until death. Security Nat. Bank of ......