Seddon v. Harpster
Decision Date | 11 April 1979 |
Docket Number | No. 78-616,78-616 |
Citation | 369 So.2d 662 |
Parties | Sara Jane SEDDON et al., Appellants, v. Fred M. HARPSTER and Doris Harpster, his wife, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
State v. Lavazzoli
...presumed that provisions added by an amendment affecting existing rights are intended to operate prospectively also. Seddon v. Harpster, 369 So.2d 662 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), ctfd. question answered, approved, 403 So.2d 409 (Fla.1981). Nowhere in either article I, section 12 as amended or in th......
-
Grant v. Strickland
...Thomas, 281 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); Meyer v. Law, 287 So.2d 37 (Fla.1973); 1974 Laws of Florida, § 74-382; Seddon v. Harpster, 369 So.2d 662, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Surely proof requirements under § 95.18 are no less exacting.9 Webster's Third New International Dictionary (Unab. ed.......
-
Clark v. Cassidy
...Or. 533, 539 n.7, 577 P.2d 477, 483 n.7 (1978). Accord, State v. Sanchez, 119 Ariz. 64, 66, 579 P.2d 568, 570 (1978); Seddon v. Harpster, 369 So.2d 662, 666 (Fla.1979); McGill v. Muddy Fork of Silver Creek Watershed Conservancy Dist., Ind.App., 370 N.E.2d 365, 370 (1977); Kittilson v. Ford,......
-
Seddon v. Harpster, 83-678
...properties to be east of where the Seddons contended. In that controversy the Harpsters won and the Seddons lost. Seddon v. Harpster, 369 So.2d 662 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), affirmed 403 So.2d 409 (Fla.1981). By "cross-claim" in the Harpster v. Seddon action, the Seddons sued their neighbors to t......
Request a trial to view additional results