Seeberg v. Norville
Citation | 204 Ala. 20,85 So. 505 |
Decision Date | 22 January 1920 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 126 |
Parties | SEEBERG v. NORVILLE et al. |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Claud A. Grayson, Judge.
Bill by Rolf Seeberg against Peyton Norville and others to set aside a mortgage executed by Norville to Mrs. Kelly, to require a reconveyance by Norville to Seeberg, and to hold them both as trustees. From a decree sustaining demurrers to the bill complainant appeals. Reversed, rendered, and remanded.
D.B Cobbs, of Mobile, for appellant.
Gaillard Mahorner & Arnold, of Mobile, for appellees.
This is the second appeal in this case; this appeal, like the former, being from an interlocutory decree of the circuit court sustaining demurrers to the bill. On the former appeal it was held, in the absence of averments showing fraud on the part of Mitchell, participated in by the respondent Norville, the bill was without equity; but it appearing that the bill might be so amended as to give it equity, while the decree sustaining the demurrers was affirmed, the time granted by the decree for amending the bill was extended for 30 days. Seeberg v. Norville et al., 202 Ala. 417, 80 So. 621.
Briefly stated, the facts presented by the bill as subsequently amended are these: The complainant being indebted to N.A. Andresen & Co., of Christiania, Norway, in a sum in excess of the value of the property described in the bill, and of which the complainant was then seized and possessed, and complainant desiring to leave Mobile, where he then resided, and at the same time so arrange that the property could be sold on request of his creditor, and the proceeds of the sale applied on the debt, he on the 14th day of June, 1912, executed to one John E. Mitchell a power of attorney, which, omitting the caption and the description of the property, is in the following words:
On the 19th day of February, 1918, 5 years and 6 months after execution of the power of attorney, Mitchell, for a consideration of $600, by deed reciting, "This conveyance is made under and by virtue of that certain power of attorney from Rolf Seeberg and wife to John E. Mitchell, dated the 14th day of June, 1912, and the written consent of N.A. Andresen & Co. attached to said power of attorney, and said power of attorney and written request being recorded in Miscellaneous Book 10, page 415, in the office of the judge of probate aforesaid," sold and conveyed the property in controversy, which the bill alleges was then worth from $4,000 to $5,000, to the respondent Norville, who borrowed from the respondent Kelly $500 to be used in the payment of the purchase money to Mitchell, and to secure which Norville executed a mortgage on the property to Kelly.
During the time intervening between the granting of the power to Mitchell and his attempted execution thereof, the debt to Andresen & Co. was paid in full. After stating these facts, the bill avers:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Copeland v. Warren
... ... therewith, and is notice of the nature of title under which ... the same is being maintained. Seeberg v. Norville, ... 204 Ala. 20, 85 So. 505; Alexander v. Fountain, 195 ... Ala. 3, 70 So. 669; Gamble v. Black Warrior Coal ... Co., 172 Ala. 672, ... ...
-
Nelson Realty Co. v. Darling Shop of Birmingham, Inc.
...Ala. 166, 59 So. 470; Randolph v. Randolph, 245 Ala. 689, 18 So.2d 555; Fuller v. Scarborough, 239 Ala. 681, 196 So. 875; Seeberg v. Norville, 204 Ala. 20, 85 So. 505; and Morgan v. Gaiter, 202 Ala. 492, 80 So. Opinion extended and application overruled. LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and C......
-
Norville v. Seeberg
...as against them." The former ruling of this court as to grounds of demurrer theretofore and now assigned was well considered ( Seeberg v. Norville, 85 So. 508), and we have desire to depart from the same. Code 1907, § 5965; Burgess v. Burgess, 201 Ala. 631, 632, 79 So. 193; C. of Ga. v. Cha......
-
King v. Porter
... ... And such dual and ... antagonistic relation of an agent or trustee may not assume ... to the prejudice of one of his principals. Seeberg v ... Norville et al., 204 Ala. 20, 85 So. 505; Holcomb et ... al. v. Forsyth, 216 Ala. 486, 491, 113 So. 516. This is ... beside the case, as we ... ...