Seibold v. Kinston-Lenoir County Public Library, KINSTON-LENOIR

Decision Date28 April 1965
Docket NumberKINSTON-LENOIR,No. 368,368
Citation264 N.C. 360,141 S.E.2d 519
PartiesLucille Wiggins SEIBOLD v.COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY and Thomas Hewitt, W. A. Allen, Alex Howard, T. J. Turner, Mrs. Wooten Moseley and Mrs. John Rowland, Trustees of the Kinston-Lenoir County Public Library.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Turner & Harrison, Kinston, for plaintiffappellant.

White & Aycock, Kinston, for defendantappellees.

PER CURIAM.

Our forefathers, drafting our first Constitution, declared the essentials of good government and happiness of mankind are religion, morality and knowledge, § 41, Constitution of 1776; now Art. IX, § 1, of our Constitution, G.S. 4A, p. 114.

The Constitutional declaration of 1776 was not a new concept to North Carolina.More than a half century prior thereto, the provincial legislature had enacted a statute captioned: 'An Act for Appointing a Town in the County of Bath and for Securing the Publick Library belonging to St. Thomas's Parish in Pamptecough,'c. LII, Laws of 1715, State Records of North Carolina, Vol. XXIII, p. 73.

An adequate library is essential for the dissemination of knowledge.Recognizing this fact, the State established a State public library in 1840.The librarian was required to keep the library open for the accommodation of the public every day, except on Sundays and the Fourth of July, seec. 92, Revised Code of 1854.

The operation of a public library meets the test of 'governmental function,' as stated in repeated decisions rendered by this Court.Clark v. Scheld, 253 N.C. 732, 117 S.E.2d 838;Jamison v. City of Charlotte, 239 N.C. 682, 80 S.E.2d 904;Britt v. City of Wilmington, 236 N.C. 446, 73 S.E.2d 289;Green v. Kitchin, 229 N.C. 450, 50 S.E.2d 545;Millar v. Town of Wilson, 222 N.C. 340, 23 S.E.2d 42.The Court of Appeals of Kentucky, in Alvey v. Brigham, 286 Ky. 610, 150 S.W.2d 935, 135 A.L.R. 1024, held that the operation of a free public library was the performance of a governmental function.The courts of Now Jersey reached a similar conclusion in Trustees, Free Public Library of Newark v. Civil Service Commission, 83 N.J.L. 196, 83 A. 980.The Supreme Court of Illinois reached a different conclusion in Johnston v. City of Chicago, decided in 1913, 258 Ill. 494, 101 N.E. 960, Ann.Cas. 1914B, 339.

Appellant relies on the Johnston case to support her assertion that the operation of a public library is a proprietary, rather than a governmental function, when operated by a municipality.We have examined the case carefully.We do not concur in the conclusion there reached.The argument there advanced would apply with...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Bynum v. Wilson Cnty.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 18, 2013
    ...“is clearly a governmental function for which the county enjoys immunity from suit for negligence.” Similarly, in Seibold v. Library, 264 N.C. 360, 141 S.E.2d 519 (1965), the plaintiff sought a personal injury recovery after falling on the steps of a governmentally owned library. In affirmi......
  • Rowan County Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 17, 1992
    ...maintenance of local public schools by a local school board is not a governmental function. We disagree. Cf. Seibold v. Library, 264 N.C. 360, 361, 141 S.E.2d 519, 520 (1965) (holding that operation of a free public library is a governmental function, as "[a]n adequate library is essential ......
  • Rowan County Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 15, 1987
    ...Koontz v. City of Winston-Salem, 280 N.C. 513, 186 S.E.2d 897, petition to rehear denied, 281 N.C. 516 (1972); Seibold v. Library, 264 N.C. 360, 141 S.E.2d 519 (1965); Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328, 106 S.E.2d 564 (1959); Rhodes v. Asheville, 230 N.C. 134, 52 S.E.2d As previously point......
  • Robinson v. Nash County
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 18, 1979
    ...the performance of her official governmental duties? The answer must be "yes." In Seibold v. Kinston-Lenoir County Public Library, 264 N.C. 360, 361, 141 S.E.2d 519, 520 (1965) (per curiam), it is said: "Having reached the conclusion that the service rendered was a governmental function, it......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT