Senie v. Carothers, 8657
Decision Date | 03 July 1990 |
Docket Number | No. 8657,8657 |
Citation | 576 A.2d 1312,22 Conn.App. 253 |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | Susan SENIE v. Leslie CAROTHERS, Commissioner of Environmental Protection, et al. |
Creighton M. English, for appellant (plaintiff).
David H. Wrinn, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom, on the brief, were Clarine Nardi Riddle, Atty. Gen., and Joseph Rubin and Brian J. Comerford, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee (named defendant et al.).
Edward V. O'Hanlan, for appellee (defendant Cedar Point Yacht Club).
Before DUPONT, C.J., and NORCOTT and LAVERY, JJ.
The sole issue in this case is whether failure to annex a citation to a petition of appeal from the final decision of an administrative agency of this state deprives the Superior Court of jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. The trial court granted a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and we agree.
This case is controlled by DelVecchio v. Department of Income Maintenance, 18 Conn.App. 13, 555 A.2d 1007 (1989). This court in DelVecchio said: "In addition to proper service, a valid appeal must contain a citation signed by a competent authority and contain a notice of the return date and notice of the requirement of filing an appearance. Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. CHRO, 201 Conn. 350, 356-57, 514 A.2d 749 (1986); Atkins v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co., 5 Conn.App. 643, 645-46, 501 A.2d 1223 (1985). Here, the plaintiff failed to annex a citation to her petition. She claims that the elimination of the requirement of service by a sheriff also abolished the necessity of a citation. That is not the law; nor is this a case of first impression.
"The necessity of a citation was first ruled upon by the Appellate Session of the Superior Court in Board of Education v. State Board of Education, 38 Conn.Sup. 712, 716, 461 A.2d 997 (1983), and subsequently by this court in Atkins v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co., supra. ' ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tolly v. Department of Human Resources
...the issue controlled by its three prior decisions: Shapiro v. Carothers, 23 Conn.App. 188, 579 A.2d 583 (1990); Senie v. Carothers, 22 Conn.App. 253, 576 A.2d 1312 (1990); and DelVecchio v. Department of Income Maintenance, 18 Conn.App. 13, 555 A.2d 1007 (1989). We granted certification to ......
-
Tolly v. Department of Human Resources, 10415
...is controlled by three prior decisions of this court: Shapiro v. Carothers, 23 Conn.App. 188, 579 A.2d 583 (1990); Senie v. Carothers, 22 Conn.App. 253, 576 A.2d 1312 (1990); and DelVecchio v. Department of Income Maintenance, 18 Conn.App. 13, 555 A.2d 1007 Despite the invitation by the pla......