Serrano v. Hocker

Decision Date04 August 1971
Docket NumberNo. 25883.,25883.
Citation444 F.2d 1093
PartiesThomas SERRANO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Carl HOCKER, Warden, Nevada State Prison, and the State of Nevada, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

David W. Hagen (argued), of Goldwater, Taber, Hill & Mortimer, F. DeArmond Sharp (argued), of Hawkins, Rhodes & Hawkins, Reno, Nev., for plaintiff-appellant.

Herbert F. Ahlswede, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Harvey Dickerson, Nevada Atty. Gen., Carson City, Nev., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In this collateral attack on a state murder conviction, we find that the test of Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284, fits the point on the introduction into evidence of an illegally seized gun. We find the error was harmless.

The other alleged errors in the state trial do not rise to constitutional proportions.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT