Serta Associates, Inc v. United States
Decision Date | 24 February 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 878,878 |
Citation | 393 U.S. 534,21 L.Ed.2d 753,89 S.Ct. 870 |
Parties | SERTA ASSOCIATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
See 394 U.S. 967, 89 S.Ct. 1303.
Sigmund Timberg, Lionel G. Gross and David V. Kahn, for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, and William R. Weissman, for the United States.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Mr. Justice WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fessler's Estate, Matter of
... ... Julian, Jr., and Julian & Associates, S. C., Madison, and Kathy Gomes and Picard, Caywood, Lucas & Watson, ... services to various radio and television stations throughout the United States ... The record reflects that the decedent was the ... ...
-
United States v. Topco Associates, Inc 8212 82
...S.Ct. 1856, 1871, 18 L.Ed.2d 1249 (1967) (Stewart, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); Serta Associates, Inc. v. United States, 393 U.S. 534, 89 S.Ct. 870, 21 L.Ed.2d 753 (1969), aff'g 296 F.Supp. 1121, 1128 We think that it is clear that the restraint in this case is a horizont......
-
Civil Aeronautics Board v. British Airways Board
... ... No. 77 Civ. 1456-CSH ... United States District Court, S. D. New York ... June 10, 1977. 433 F. Supp ... ...
-
Three Phoenix Co. v. Pace Industries, Inc.
...613-19, 92 S.Ct. 1126 at 1136-39, 31 L.Ed.2d 515 at 529-533, (Burger, C.J. dissenting), discussing Serta Associates, Inc. v. United States, 393 U.S. 534, 89 S.Ct. 870, 21 L.Ed.2d 753 (1969), aff'g 296 F.Supp. 1121 (N.D.Ill.1968); United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co., 388 U.S. 365, 87 S.Ct......
-
Joint Action by Franchisees
...Ill. 1968) (agreement among association members to adhere to prices specified by association in local advertising), aff’d per curiam , 393 U.S. 534 (1969); see also, e.g. , PolyGram Holding, 136 F.T.C. 310, 354 (2003) (agreement between competitors not to advertise Three Tenors CDs and DVDs......
-
Pricing Issues
...211 (1899); see also , Topco , 405 U.S. 596; Citizen Publ’g Co. v. United States, 394 U.S. 131 (1969); Serta Assocs. v. United States, 393 U.S. 534 (1969); United States v. Sealy, Inc., 388 U.S. 350 (1967); Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 (1958); Timken Roller Bearing C o......
-
Analysis of Trade and Professional Association Horizontal Restraints Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act
...E.g. , Plymouth Dealers’ Ass’n , 279 F.2d at 132. 49. United States v. Serta Assocs., 296 F. Supp. 1121, 1125@26 (N.D. Ill. 1968), aff’d , 393 U.S. 534 (1969) (per curiam). 50. FTC v. Super. Ct. Trial Lawyers Ass’n, 493 U.S. 411, 428@36 (1990). 51. Arizona v. Maricopa Cty. Med. Soc’y, 457 U......
-
Table of Cases
...(8th Cir. 2008), 90, 178, 180 Table of Cases 273 Serfecz v. Jewel Foods, 67 F.3d 591 (7th Cir. 1995), 81 Serta Assocs. v. United States, 393 U.S. 534 (1969), 207 Smith Wholesale Co. v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc., 219 F. App’x 398 (6th Cir. 2007), 8 1 Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co., 10......