Servo Corporation of America v. General Electric Company, 9190.

Decision Date18 February 1965
Docket NumberNo. 9190.,9190.
PartiesSERVO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant and Cross-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Frank W. Rogers, Leonard G. Muse, Roanoke, Va., Charles H. Walker, David W. Plant, Luther E. Birdzell, Jr., George V. Eltgroth, Melvin M. Goldenberg, New York City, for appellant and cross-appellee.

B. Purnell Eggleston, Roanoke, Va., Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., Keith E. Mullenger, Roy C. Hopgood, New York City, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, SOBELOFF and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judges.

On Petition to Rehear.

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration, the court being of the opinion that no good cause is shown, the petitions to rehear filed by both the parties to this appeal are denied.

We think it consistent with the opinion heretofore filed that the district court should allow Servo damages only for General Electric's appropriation of that portion of its work which was not publicly disclosed prior to the visit to Salisbury on April 10, 1958, and that these damages should be measured by General Electric's cost of acquiring the same information by its own experimentation. It is, therefore,

Ordered that the said petitions be, and they are hereby, denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • November 15, 1974
    ...secret on his own, using the actual development costs of the plaintiff as the complete measure of damages. Servo Corp. v. General Electric Co., 342 F.2d 993 (4th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 934, 86 S.Ct. 1061, 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966). This measure of damages simply uses the plaintiff's......
  • Molex Co. v. Andress
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • August 10, 2012
    ...own, using the actual development costs of the plaintiff as the complete measure of damages.” Id. at 538 (citing Servo Corp. v. General Electric Co., 342 F.2d 993 (4th Cir.1965), cert. denied,383 U.S. 934, 86 S.Ct. 1061, 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966)). However, the former Fifth Circuit's opinion in......
  • Molex Co. v. Andress
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • August 10, 2012
  • Title Trading Servs. United States, Inc. v. Arindam Kundu, Coastal Mgmt., LLC, 3:14-CV-225-RJC-DCK
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of North Carolina
    • January 4, 2016
    ...own experimentation" where an agent of the plaintiff/owner took a confidential design and began using it for its own benefit. 342 F.2d 993, 993 (4th Cir. 1965). In this case, Plaintiff submits that the proper method for calculating damages is to measure Plaintiff's development costs. It is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Appendix I University Computing Co. v.Lykes-Youngstown Corp., 504 F.2d 518 (5th Cir. 1974)
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Guide to Protecting and Litigating Trade Secrets
    • June 27, 2012
    ...on his own, using the actual development costs of the plaintiff as the complete measure of damages. Servo Corp. v. General Electric Co. , 342 F.2d 993 (4th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 934, 86 S.Ct. 1061, 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966). This measure of damages simply uses the plaintiff’s actua......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT