Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 531
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 409 F.2d 1360 |
| Parties | Edward SERZYSKO, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant. |
| Docket Number | 33097.,532,Dockets 33096,No. 531,531 |
| Decision Date | 20 May 1969 |
409 F.2d 1360 (1969)
Edward SERZYSKO, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee,
v.
The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
Nos. 531, 532, Dockets 33096, 33097.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued April 22, 1969.
Decided May 20, 1969.
Arthur C. Fink, New York City (Fink, Weinberger & Levin, New York City, and Walter Talmont, Hempstead, N. Y., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant-appellee.
A. Donald MacKinnon, New York City (Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy and Adlai S. Hardin, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for defendant-respondent-appellant.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WYATT, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
We affirm in all respects the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York for the reasons stated in the thorough and well reasoned opinion of Judge Graven reported at 290 F.Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y.1968).
--------
Notes:
* Sitting by designation.
--------
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Schiaffo v. Helstoski, Civ. A. No. 1571-72.
...U.S. 1013, 91 S.Ct. 1250, 28 L.Ed.2d 550 (1971); Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 290 F.Supp. 74, 78, 85-90 (S.D. N.Y.1968), aff'd mem., 409 F.2d 1360 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 904, 90 S.Ct. 218, 24 L.Ed.2d 180 (1969). Deterrence can be achieved by affording the private litigant in......
-
Stern v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., No. 78-1377
...Inc. v. Smith (9th Cir. 1962) 312 F.2d 210, 213-14; Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank (S.D.N.Y.1968) 290 F.Supp. 74, 88-90, Aff'd. 409 F.2d 1360 (1969), Cert. denied 396 U.S. 904, 90 S.Ct. 218, 24 L.Ed.2d 180; Moscarelli v. Stamm (E.D.N.Y.1968) 288 F.Supp. 453, 459. Subsequent to Remar, a nu......
-
Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co., No. 241
...Blair & Co., 50 F.R.D. 89 (S.D.N.Y.1970) (tippee-tipper action); Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 290 F.Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd 409 F.2d 1360 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 904, 90 S.Ct. 218, 24 L.Ed.2d 180 (1969) (Regulation U, active deception on part of plaintiff). In the insta......
-
Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, No. 92
...Exchange Commission.8 As the district court observed in Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 290 F.Supp. 74, 87-90 (SDNY 1968), aff'd mem., 409 F.2d 1360 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 904, 90 S.Ct. 218 (1969), the defense of in pari delicto in securities law cases has been undermined by the......
-
Schiaffo v. Helstoski, Civ. A. No. 1571-72.
...U.S. 1013, 91 S.Ct. 1250, 28 L.Ed.2d 550 (1971); Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 290 F.Supp. 74, 78, 85-90 (S.D. N.Y.1968), aff'd mem., 409 F.2d 1360 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 904, 90 S.Ct. 218, 24 L.Ed.2d 180 (1969). Deterrence can be achieved by affording the private litigant in......
-
Stern v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., No. 78-1377
...Inc. v. Smith (9th Cir. 1962) 312 F.2d 210, 213-14; Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank (S.D.N.Y.1968) 290 F.Supp. 74, 88-90, Aff'd. 409 F.2d 1360 (1969), Cert. denied 396 U.S. 904, 90 S.Ct. 218, 24 L.Ed.2d 180; Moscarelli v. Stamm (E.D.N.Y.1968) 288 F.Supp. 453, 459. Subsequent to Remar, a nu......
-
Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co., No. 241
...Blair & Co., 50 F.R.D. 89 (S.D.N.Y.1970) (tippee-tipper action); Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 290 F.Supp. 74 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd 409 F.2d 1360 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 904, 90 S.Ct. 218, 24 L.Ed.2d 180 (1969) (Regulation U, active deception on part of plaintiff). In the insta......
-
Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, No. 92
...Exchange Commission.8 As the district court observed in Serzysko v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 290 F.Supp. 74, 87-90 (SDNY 1968), aff'd mem., 409 F.2d 1360 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 904, 90 S.Ct. 218 (1969), the defense of in pari delicto in securities law cases has been undermined by the......