Seymour v. State, CR-04-1137.

Citation946 So.2d 535
Decision Date23 November 2005
Docket NumberCR-04-1137.
PartiesChristopher Jacques SEYMOUR v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court (CC-2002-072.60); Tom F. Young, Jr., Judge.

Christopher Seymour, pro se.

Troy King, atty. gen., and Stephanie N. Morman, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., and WISE, J., concur. BASCHAB and SHAW JJ., concur in the result. COBB, J., dissents, with opinion.

COBB, Judge (dissenting).

For the reasons I joined Judge Shaw's special writing in Sullens v. State, 878 So.2d 1216 (Ala.Crim.App.2003)(Shaw, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), I cannot agree with the conclusion in the unpublished memorandum that the indictment in this case, which failed to allege a culpable mental state, was sufficient to charge the offense of shooting into an occupied dwelling, a violation of § 13A-11-61, Ala.Code 1975. Moreover, unlike Harrison v. State, 879 So.2d 594 (Ala.Crim. App.2003)(Shaw, J., concurring in result) in which I joined Judge Shaw's special writing, the indictment in the instant case was not amended by a jury charge supplying the requisite intent.1 Thus, I must respectfully dissent.

1. We have taken judicial notice of the record from the appellant's direct appeal in this case. See Nettles v. State, 731 So.2d 626 (Ala.Crim. App.1998).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Davis v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 30, 2013
    ...is entitled to relief if "[t]he court was without jurisdiction to render judgment or to impose sentence." In Ex parte Seymour, 946 So. 2d 535, 537 n. 3 (Ala. 2006), the Alabama Supreme Court explained: "The language 'jurisdiction to render judgment or impose sentence' [in Rule 32.1(b), Ala.......
  • Ex Parte Seymour
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 30, 2006
    ...Rule 32 petition in an unpublished memorandum; Judge Cobb dissented from the memorandum affirmance with an opinion. Seymour v. State, 946 So.2d 535 (Ala.Crim.App.2005). In her dissent, Judge Cobb "For the reasons I joined Judge Shaw's special writing in Sullens v. State, 878 So.2d 1216 (Ala......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT