Shabazz v. New York

Decision Date21 January 2003
Docket NumberNo. 02-7597.,02-7597.
Citation537 U.S. 1165
PartiesSHABAZZ v. NEW YORK.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FOURTH JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Pizarro
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 9 Junio 2017
    ...to preserve for our review his current Bruton contention (cf. People v. Shabazz, 289 A.D.2d 1059, 1060, 735 N.Y.S.2d 691, cert. denied 537 U.S. 1165, 123 S.Ct. 976, 154 L.Ed.2d 903, affd. 99 N.Y.2d 634, 760 N.Y.S.2d 717, 790 N.E.2d 1146, rearg. denied 100 N.Y.2d 556, 763 N.Y.S.2d 814, 795 N......
  • People v. Jacque-Crews
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 10 Febrero 2023
    ...possessed reasonable suspicion to act (see People v. Shabazz , 289 A.D.2d 1059, 1059-1060, 735 N.Y.S.2d 691 [4th Dept. 2001], cert denied 537 U.S. 1165, 123 S.Ct. 976, 154 L.Ed.2d 903 [2003], affd 99 N.Y.2d 634, 760 N.Y.S.2d 717, 790 N.E.2d 1146 [2003], rearg denied 100 N.Y.2d 556, 763 N.Y.......
  • People v. Jacque-Crews
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 10 Febrero 2023
    ...2023 NY Slip Op 00785 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. DEVINE D. JACQUE-CREWS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. No. 1024 KA 19-00316Supreme Court of New York, Fourth DepartmentFebruary 10, 2023 ... agency imparting the information possessed reasonable ... suspicion to act (see People v Shabazz, 289 A.D.2d ... 1059, 1059-1060 [4th Dept 2001], cert denied 537 ... U.S. 1165 [2003], affd 99 N.Y.2d 634 [2003], ... rearg denied 100 N.Y.2d 556 ... ...
  • People v. Pizarro
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 9 Junio 2017
    ...a mistrial is sufficient to preserve for our review his current Bruton contention (cf. People v Shabazz, 289 AD2d 1059, 1060, cert denied 537 US 1165, affd 99 NY2d 634, rearg denied 100 NY2d 556), we conclude that the introduction of the statements did not implicate the principles of the Co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT