Shafer v. Ferguson

Decision Date23 September 1885
Docket Number11,762
Citation2 N.E. 302,103 Ind. 90
PartiesShafer v. Ferguson
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

Judgment affirmed.

A. W. Reynolds, J. H. Wallace and E. B. Sellers, for appellant.

R. Gregory, for appellee.

OPINION

Elliott, J.

The only question argued by the appellant is that arising upon the ruling of the trial court in admitting the testimony of Alexander Conklin.

It is settled that the record must set forth the objections to the testimony that were stated to the trial court, and that no objections can be urged here except those stated to the court upon the trial. It is also settled that objections must be specifically stated, or they will be of no avail. Bottenberg v. Nixon, 97 Ind. 106; Jones v. Angell, 95 Ind. 376; Lake Erie, etc., R. W. Co. v. Parker, 94 Ind. 91; Harvey v. Huston, 94 Ind. 527; McClellan v. Bond, 92 Ind. 424; Stanley v. Sutherland, 54 Ind. 339. The objections stated to the trial court in this cause are not sufficiently specific.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT