Shaffer v. The Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of the State

Decision Date12 May 2022
Docket Number84118
PartiesCANDICE SHAFFER; AND TRAVIS HEINRICH, Petitioners, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE NADIA KRALL, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and MARK SHAFFER; AND MYVEGAS ! MAGAZINE, Real Parties in Interest.
CourtNevada Supreme Court

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

PARRAGUIRRE C.J.

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss a complaint under NRCP 16.1(e).

Having considered the petition and its supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist, Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted). Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and whether to consider a petition seeking such relief is within this court's sole discretion. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). We generally decline to exercise that discretion to grant writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss, and we are not convinced any of the exceptions for doing so apply in this case. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (discussing the exceptions to the general rule). We therefore

ORDER the petition DENIED.[1]

Herndon, J. Gibsons, Sr. J.

Hon. Nadia Krall, District Judge

---------

[1]The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.

---------

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT