Shamrock Oil & Gas Co. v. Williams
| Decision Date | 20 September 1933 |
| Docket Number | No. 4069.,4069. |
| Citation | Shamrock Oil & Gas Co. v. Williams, 63 S.W.2d 570 (Tex. App. 1933) |
| Parties | SHAMROCK OIL & GAS CO. v. WILLIAMS et al. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Potter County; W. E. Gee, Judge.
Suit by Otis L. Williams and another against the Shamrock Oil & Gas Company and another.From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendant named appeals.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and judgment rendered in accordance with opinion.
Underwood, Johnson, Dooley & Huff, of Amarillo, for appellant.
Madden, Adkins, Pipkin & Keffer, of Amarillo, for appellees.
Otis L. Williams and the Kelly Petroleum Company, Inc., instituted this suit against the Shamrock Oil & Gas Company and the Amarillo National Bank to recover $4,000 which had been deposited in said bank by the Shamrock Oil & Gas Company to secure the performance of a contract entered into between the Shamrock Oil & Gas Company and the plaintiffs.The plaintiffs are named as parties of the first part and the Shamrock Oil & Gas Company is styled party of the second part.The contract, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:
The controversy was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts, which disclosed that on or about May 5, 1930, plaintiffs Williams and the Petroleum Company entered into the foregoing contract.The petition alleged that the Shamrock Company had failed to drill the well within the time required and, in fact, had failed to drill at all, for which reason the sum of $4,000 which was placed in escrow as liquidated damages should be adjudged to them.
The Shamrock Company answered, alleging that the title placed in escrow by the plaintiffs did not convey good and merchantable title as required by the contract; that it was provided that time was of the essence of the contract, and immediately upon discovery of the defective title placed in escrow it treated the contract as terminated, because plaintiffs had first breached the contract for the sale of the mining lease in question by their failure to place in escrow a good and merchantable title, and prayed that the $4,000 earnest money theretofore placed in escrow be decreed to it.
The Amarillo National Bank answered, alleging that it was a mere stakeholder in the transaction and held the $4,000 as such, and was ready and willing to pay the same to whoever the court decided was entitled to the fund.It prayed that it be allowed reasonable attorney's fees for filing the answer.
A trial to the court without a jury resulted in a decree that the Shamrock Oil & Gas Company had no interest in the fund held by the bank; that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover said sum, less $100 as a reasonable attorney's fee.It was further adjudged that plaintiffs recover as against the Shamrock Oil & Gas Company said $100 and that said Oil & Gas Company pay all costs.
By its first propositionthe appellant insists that the trial court erred in rendering a judgment because the contract was executory and provided that time was of the essence of the contract and the vendor failed to plead and prove that a good and merchantable title was placed in escrow at the time and in the manner provided by the contract.
The case was prepared and tried under R. S., art. 2177.It is uniformly held that where there is an agreed statement of facts which is submitted to the court under art. 2177, that all issues with regard to the pleadings are immaterial.Scott v. Slaughter, 97 Tex. 244, 77 S. W. 949;Harde v. Germania Life Ins. Co.(Tex. Civ. App.)153 S. W. 666;Thaison v. Sanchez, ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Webb v. Consolidated Oil Co.
...S.W. 443; Giles v. Union Land Co., Tex.Civ.App., 196 S.W. 312; Crutcher v. Aiken, Tex.Civ.App., 252 S.W. 844; Shamrock Oil & Gas Co. v. Williams, Tex.Civ.App., 63 S.W.2d 570; Williams v. Shamrock Oil & Gas Co., 128 Tex. 146, 95 S.W.2d 1292, 107 A.L.R. 269; Friedrich v. Seligmann, Tex.Civ.Ap......
-
Spencer v. Maverick, 10674.
...seem unnecessary that the purchaser should insert in the contract any provision assuring him such title.'" Shamrock Oil & Gas Co. v. Williams, Tex.Civ.App., 63 S.W.2d 570, 574. At the outset we must determine the question of whether the burden rested upon appellee to show, or upon appellant......
-
Patton v. Wilson, 11913.
...Prætorians v. Simons, Tex.Civ.App., 187 S.W.2d 238; Abilene Hotel Corp. v. Gill, Tex.Civ.App., 187 S.W.2d 708; Shamrock Oil & Gas Co. v. Williams, Tex.Civ.App., 63 S.W.2d 570; Cobb v. Harrington, 144 Tex. 360, 190 S.W.2d 709, 172 A.L.R. 837. See Also: Bednarz v. State, 142 Tex. 138, 176 S.W......
-
The Praetorians v. Simons
...S.W. 666-669, in El Fresnal Irrigated Land Co. v. Bank of Washington, Tex.Civ. App., 182 S.W. 701, 703, and in Shamrock Oil & Gas Co. v. Williams, Tex.Civ.App., 63 S.W.2d 570, 572. The case, in our opinion, turns on the decision of appellant's point of error No. 4 which, in substance, is th......