Shannon v. Fusco, No. 119 Sept.Term 2013
| Court | Court of Appeals of Maryland |
| Citation | 69 A.3d 474,432 Md. 466 |
| Docket Number | No. 119 Sept.Term 2013 |
| Parties | Shannon v. Fusco |
| Decision Date | 03 July 2013 |
432 Md. 466
69 A.3d 474
Shannon
v.
Fusco
No. 119 Sept.Term 2013
Court of Appeals of Maryland
July 03, 2013
Reported below: 210 Md.App. 399, 63 A.3d 145.
Disposition: Granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 practice notes
-
Shannon v. Fusco, No. 57
...evidence that Dr. Shannon failed to advise Mr. Fusco of “material risks” to Amifostine, either in discovery or at trial.6Shannon v. Fusco, 432 Md. 466, 69 A.3d 474 (2013). After Anthony Fusco had been diagnosed with prostate cancer he consulted with a radiation oncologist and decided to und......
-
Shannon v. Fusco, No. 57
...evidence that Dr. Shannon failed to advise Mr. Fusco of "material risks" to Amifostine, either in discovery or at trial.6Shannon v. Fusco, 432 Md. 466, 69 A.3d 474 (2013). After Anthony Fusco had been diagnosed with prostate cancer he consulted with a radiation oncologist and decided to und......
2 cases
-
Shannon v. Fusco, No. 57
...evidence that Dr. Shannon failed to advise Mr. Fusco of “material risks” to Amifostine, either in discovery or at trial.6Shannon v. Fusco, 432 Md. 466, 69 A.3d 474 (2013). After Anthony Fusco had been diagnosed with prostate cancer he consulted with a radiation oncologist and decided to und......
-
Shannon v. Fusco, No. 57
...evidence that Dr. Shannon failed to advise Mr. Fusco of "material risks" to Amifostine, either in discovery or at trial.6Shannon v. Fusco, 432 Md. 466, 69 A.3d 474 (2013). After Anthony Fusco had been diagnosed with prostate cancer he consulted with a radiation oncologist and decided to und......