Shapiro v. Essex County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders
| Decision Date | 01 December 1982 |
| Citation | 91 N.J. 430,453 A.2d 158 |
| Parties | Peter SHAPIRO, Essex County Executive, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ESSEX COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Thomas M. McCormack, West Orange, Counsel, for defendant-appellant.
David H. Ben-Asher, Essex County Counsel, Newark, for plaintiff-respondent (David H. Ben-Asher, attorney; Marc C. Gettis, Asst. County Counsel, Roselle Park, on the brief).
Charles M. Schimenti, Jersey City, Counsel, for amicus curiae Hudson County Board of Chosen Freeholders.
Barry D. Szaferman, Deputy County Counsel, Lawrenceville, submitted letter in lieu of brief on behalf of amicus curiae Mercer County Executive (Paul T. Koenig, County Counsel, Pennington, attorney).
The Essex County Executive brought this action challenging the Comprehensive Salary Ordinance passed by the Essex County Board of Chosen Freeholders seeking a declaration of his authority to set salaries of county employees under the Optional County Charter Law, N.J.S.A. 40:41A-1 to -147. The trial court entered summary judgment for the County Executive. 177 N.J.Super. 87, 424 A.2d 1203 (Law Div.1980). That judgment was affirmed in an opinion by Judge Matthews for the Appellate Division. 183 N.J.Super. 24, 443 A.2d 219 (1982). We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in his opinion.
Resolution of the issue depends upon an interpretation of the general statutes governing counties and the specific provisions governing a county operating under the Optional County Charter Law, in particular one where the county has selected the county executive plan. N.J.S.A. 40:41A-31. The general statute, N.J.S.A. 40A:9-10, provides:
Except as otherwise provided by law, the board of chosen freeholders of the county or the governing body of the municipality shall fix the amount of salary, wages or other compensation to be paid to county and municipal officers and employees unless they are to serve without compensation. [Emphasis added]
This statute authorized the governing body of the county or municipality to fix the salaries and wages of officers and employees. Under the county executive plan, the governing body includes "both the board of freeholders and the county executive." N.J.S.A. 40:41A-32(b). The county executive then would fall within the class empowered under the act to fix salaries. Moreover, that statutory provision also states:
... For the purpose of the construction of all other applicable statutes, any and all administrative or executive functions heretofore assigned by general law to the board of freeholders shall be exercised by the county executive, and any and all legislative and investigative functions heretofore assigned by general law to the board of freeholders shall be exercised by the board, all in accordance with the separation of powers provided for in section 86 of the act of which this act is amendatory (C. 40:41A-86). [Emphasis added]
Fixing salaries of county employees in the executive and administrative branches of government is primarily an administrative or executive function that the Optional Charter Law has delegated to the county...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Szemple
...of the Legislature. Shapiro v. Essex County Bd. of Freeholders, 177 N.J.Super. 87, 93, 424 A.2d 1203 (Law Div.1980), aff'd, 91 N.J. 430, 453 A.2d 158 (1982); see 2A Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § Based on our review of the origin of the priest-penitent privilege and the history of th......
-
County of Essex v. Waldman
...Board, 177 N.J.Super. 87, 93, 424 A.2d 1203 (Law Div.1980), aff'd 183 N.J.Super. 24, 443 A.2d 219 (App.Div.1982), aff'd 91 N.J. 430, 453 A.2d 158 (1982). Where it is apparent that the drafters of a statute did not contemplate a specific situation, in this case the disposition of Social Secu......
-
State ex rel. Helman v. Gallegos
...or commissions appointed to study and suggest legislation"), aff'd, 183 N.J.Super. 24, 443 A.2d 219 (App.Div.), aff'd, 91 N.J. 430, 453 A.2d 158 (1982); Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd. of Vocational, Technical & Adult Educ., 117 Wis.2d 529, 345 N.W.2d 389, 396-97 (1984) (approving use of c......
-
Johnson Machinery Co., Inc. v. Manville Sales Corp.
...Freeholders, 177 N.J.Super. 87, 92-93, 424 A.2d 1203 (Law Div.1980), aff'd, 183 N.J.Super. 24, 443 A.2d 219 (App.Div.), aff'd, 91 N.J. 430, 453 A.2d 158 (1982). Sources of legislative intent are the language of a statute, the policy behind it, concepts of reasonableness and legislative hist......