Shapleigh v. Shapleigh
Decision Date | 28 July 1899 |
Citation | 69 N.H. 577,44 A. 107 |
Parties | SHAPLEIGH v. SHAPLEIGH et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Bill by Sarah A. Shapleigh, executrix, against James H. Shapleigh and others.Case discharged.
Bill in equity for the construction of a will.Pacts agreed.Richard W. Shapleigh, of Somersworth, died May 24, 1897, aged 35 years, and unmarried, leaving as next of kin his mother, and a brother of the half blood, James H. Shapleigh.He left a will, which, besides bequeathing his watch and sundry sums of money, together amounting to $300, contains the following provisions: He named his mother as executrix of the will, and directed that she should not be required to give a bond, file an inventory of the estate, or "account therefor to the probate court."Richard resided with his mother at the time of his death, and for several years prior thereto, and paid a certain proportion of the household expenses.He had some knowledge of legal terms, having studied law for a short time.His mother was 74 years old, and in good health.The portion of his estate that will pass by the tenth and eleventh clauses of the will amounts to about $18,000.Sarah has $5,000 that was bequeathed to her by her late husband, and is also entitled to the income of some $4,000 or $5,000 more under his will.Fred R. Shapleigh, also a resident of Somersworth, died April 1, 1894, leaving a widow, Marion T. Shapleigh, and no children.By his will, made prior to his marriage, he gave the residue of his estate, after the payment of his debts, sundry legacies, etc., to his brother, said Richard, who was nominated and appointed executor of the will.His estate consisted of personal property of the value of $15,000, and real estate of the value of $1,400.One half of the personal estate left after the payment of debts has been paid and transferred to the widow.At some time before Richard's will was made, there was an understanding between him and James that the other half of Fred's personal estate should be equally divided between Sarah, Richard, and James.Sarah, the executrix of Richard's will, is the plaintiff, and prays for a construction of the sixth and tenth clauses thereof.The defendants are James, Marion, and Lizzie, and are all the other parties interested in such construction.
William F. Russell and John S. H. Frink, for plaintiff.
Dwight Hall and Edwin G. Eastman, for defendants.
CHASE, J. 1.What, if anything, is Marion entitled to under the sixth clause of Richard's will?Strictly speaking, there was nothing coming to Richard as an heir of Fred.The only way in which he...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Little
...Will, 30 Misc. (N.Y.) 281; Hoke v. Jackman, 182 Ind. 536; Plummer v. Shepherd, 94 Md. 466; Greenwood v. Murray, 28 Minn. 120; Shapleigh v. Shapleigh, 69 N.H. 577; Ex parte Artz, 9 Md. 65; In re Bolton, 14 Ont. Weekly Notes, 87; 2 Schouler on Wills (6 Ed.) sec. 993; Webster's Dict. "Heir." (......
-
St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Little
... ... Haynes, 202 Mass. 531; McCabe v. Spruil, 16 ... N.C. 189; Cross v. Hoch, 149 Mo. 325; Records v ... Fields, 155 Mo. 314; Shapleigh v. Shapleigh, 69 ... N.H. 157; Smith v. Haynes, 202 Mass. 531; Eisman ... v. Poindexter, 52 Ind. 401. (3) The word ... "heirs" was used by ... ...
-
Abbott v. Wagner
...the objects and purposes testator had in mind in creating the life estate. Burnet v. Burnet, 244 Mo. 491, 148 S.W. 872; Shapleigh v. Shapleigh, 69 N.H. 577, 44 A. 107. cannot think that, having created a life estate in express terms, and having provided a gift over of such portion of the pr......
-
In re Robinson's Will
...give it or will it away. In his calls upon the estate he must act reasonably and in good faith toward the hospital. See Shapleigh v. Shapleigh, 69 N. H. 577, 44 A. 107; Bevans v. Murray, 251 Ill. 603, 96 N. E. 546; Weston v. Second Orthodox Congregational Soc, 77 N. H. 576, 95 A. 146; Parks......