Sharks v. State , ED 94927.
Decision Date | 19 April 2011 |
Docket Number | No. ED 94927.,ED 94927. |
Citation | 339 S.W.3d 627 |
Parties | Michael SHARKS, Appellant,v.STATE of Missouri, Respondent. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREAppeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Case No. 1022–CC00047, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.Andrew Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., John W. Grantham, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.
Michael Sharks appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion.We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous.Rule 29.15(k).An extended opinion would have no precedential value.We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only.We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Sharks v. Norman
...was denied without an evidentiary hearing. The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief. Sharks v. State, 339 S.W.3d 627 (Mo. App. 2011). Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Jefferson City Correctional Center in Jefferson City, Missouri. In the instant......
- In the EState Strayer v. State