Sharks v. State , ED 94927.

Decision Date19 April 2011
Docket NumberNo. ED 94927.,ED 94927.
Citation339 S.W.3d 627
PartiesMichael SHARKS, Appellant,v.STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREAppeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Case No. 1022–CC00047, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.Andrew Zleit, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., John W. Grantham, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Sharks appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion.We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous.Rule 29.15(k).An extended opinion would have no precedential value.We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only.We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
2 cases
  • Sharks v. Norman
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • 14 Mayo 2012
    ...was denied without an evidentiary hearing. The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief. Sharks v. State, 339 S.W.3d 627 (Mo. App. 2011). Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Jefferson City Correctional Center in Jefferson City, Missouri. In the instant......
  • In the EState Strayer v. State
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 19 Abril 2011

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT