Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, No. 10510.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
Writing for the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit
Citation195 F.2d 890
PartiesSHARON HERALD CO. v. GRANGER.
Docket NumberNo. 10510.
Decision Date10 April 1952
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Zubik v. Zubik, No. 15940-15951.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • September 29, 1967
    ...Corp., 392 Pa. 481, 492, 140 A.2d 808 (1958); Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 97 F.Supp. 295, 301 (W.D.Pa.1951), aff'd on other grounds, 195 F.2d 890 (3rd Cir. 1952). In the context of an attempt by an outside party to pierce the corporate veil of such a closely-held corporation, the informal......
  • Curcio v. Comm'r , Docket Nos. 10–3578–ag(L), 10–3585–ag(CON), 10–5004–ag(CON), 10–5072–ag(CON).
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • August 9, 2012
    ...(7th Cir.1960) (citing Deputy v. du Pont, 308 U.S. 488, 494–96, 60 S.Ct. 363, 84 L.Ed. 416 (1940)); accord Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 195 F.2d 890, 895 (3d Cir.1952). An expense need not be habitual to be “ordinary,” see Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 113–14, 54 S.Ct. 8, 78 L.Ed. 212 ......
  • Noel v. United Aircraft Corporation, No. 14727
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • December 9, 1964
    ...is for probative facts capable of supporting, with reason, the conclusion reached in the verdict. Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 195 F.2d 890, 895 (3 Cir. 1952); In re Lueders' Estate, 164 F.2d 128, 133 (3 Cir. 1947). The rule was succinctly stated in Galloway v. United States, 319 U.S. 372,......
  • In re Tug Management Corporation, Admiralty No. 421 of 1965
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • August 5, 1971
    ...Corp., 392 Pa. 481, 492, 140 A.2d 808 (1958); Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 97 F.Supp. 295, 301 (W.D.Pa.1951), affirmed on other grounds, 195 F.2d 890 (3rd Cir. 1952). Where an outside party seeks to pierce the veil, the formalities are of little importance.14 Petition of Dennis T. Sheridan......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Zubik v. Zubik, No. 15940-15951.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • September 29, 1967
    ...Corp., 392 Pa. 481, 492, 140 A.2d 808 (1958); Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 97 F.Supp. 295, 301 (W.D.Pa.1951), aff'd on other grounds, 195 F.2d 890 (3rd Cir. 1952). In the context of an attempt by an outside party to pierce the corporate veil of such a closely-held corporation, the informal......
  • Curcio v. Comm'r , Docket Nos. 10–3578–ag(L), 10–3585–ag(CON), 10–5004–ag(CON), 10–5072–ag(CON).
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • August 9, 2012
    ...(7th Cir.1960) (citing Deputy v. du Pont, 308 U.S. 488, 494–96, 60 S.Ct. 363, 84 L.Ed. 416 (1940)); accord Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 195 F.2d 890, 895 (3d Cir.1952). An expense need not be habitual to be “ordinary,” see Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 113–14, 54 S.Ct. 8, 78 L.Ed. 212 ......
  • Noel v. United Aircraft Corporation, No. 14727
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • December 9, 1964
    ...is for probative facts capable of supporting, with reason, the conclusion reached in the verdict. Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 195 F.2d 890, 895 (3 Cir. 1952); In re Lueders' Estate, 164 F.2d 128, 133 (3 Cir. 1947). The rule was succinctly stated in Galloway v. United States, 319 U.S. 372,......
  • Salley v. CIR, No. 71-3122 Summary Calendar.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • July 24, 1972
    ...by the borrower. Cf. Guardian Investment Corp. v. Phinney, 5 Cir. 1958, 253 F.2d 326; Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 3 Cir. 1952, 195 F.2d 890; and see Deputy v. Du Pont, supra, where the Supreme Court discusses the business expense deductions of the predecessor of Section 162 (Section 23(a)......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT