Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, No. 10510.
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit) |
Writing for the Court | McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit |
Citation | 195 F.2d 890 |
Parties | SHARON HERALD CO. v. GRANGER. |
Docket Number | No. 10510. |
Decision Date | 10 April 1952 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Zubik v. Zubik, No. 15940-15951.
...Corp., 392 Pa. 481, 492, 140 A.2d 808 (1958); Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 97 F.Supp. 295, 301 (W.D.Pa.1951), aff'd on other grounds, 195 F.2d 890 (3rd Cir. 1952). In the context of an attempt by an outside party to pierce the corporate veil of such a closely-held corporation, the informal......
-
Curcio v. Comm'r , Docket Nos. 10–3578–ag(L), 10–3585–ag(CON), 10–5004–ag(CON), 10–5072–ag(CON).
...(7th Cir.1960) (citing Deputy v. du Pont, 308 U.S. 488, 494–96, 60 S.Ct. 363, 84 L.Ed. 416 (1940)); accord Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 195 F.2d 890, 895 (3d Cir.1952). An expense need not be habitual to be “ordinary,” see Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 113–14, 54 S.Ct. 8, 78 L.Ed. 212 ......
-
Noel v. United Aircraft Corporation, No. 14727
...is for probative facts capable of supporting, with reason, the conclusion reached in the verdict. Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 195 F.2d 890, 895 (3 Cir. 1952); In re Lueders' Estate, 164 F.2d 128, 133 (3 Cir. 1947). The rule was succinctly stated in Galloway v. United States, 319 U.S. 372,......
-
In re Tug Management Corporation, Admiralty No. 421 of 1965
...Corp., 392 Pa. 481, 492, 140 A.2d 808 (1958); Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 97 F.Supp. 295, 301 (W.D.Pa.1951), affirmed on other grounds, 195 F.2d 890 (3rd Cir. 1952). Where an outside party seeks to pierce the veil, the formalities are of little importance.14 Petition of Dennis T. Sheridan......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Zubik v. Zubik, No. 15940-15951.
...Corp., 392 Pa. 481, 492, 140 A.2d 808 (1958); Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 97 F.Supp. 295, 301 (W.D.Pa.1951), aff'd on other grounds, 195 F.2d 890 (3rd Cir. 1952). In the context of an attempt by an outside party to pierce the corporate veil of such a closely-held corporation, the informal......
-
Curcio v. Comm'r , Docket Nos. 10–3578–ag(L), 10–3585–ag(CON), 10–5004–ag(CON), 10–5072–ag(CON).
...(7th Cir.1960) (citing Deputy v. du Pont, 308 U.S. 488, 494–96, 60 S.Ct. 363, 84 L.Ed. 416 (1940)); accord Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 195 F.2d 890, 895 (3d Cir.1952). An expense need not be habitual to be “ordinary,” see Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 113–14, 54 S.Ct. 8, 78 L.Ed. 212 ......
-
Noel v. United Aircraft Corporation, No. 14727
...is for probative facts capable of supporting, with reason, the conclusion reached in the verdict. Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 195 F.2d 890, 895 (3 Cir. 1952); In re Lueders' Estate, 164 F.2d 128, 133 (3 Cir. 1947). The rule was succinctly stated in Galloway v. United States, 319 U.S. 372,......
-
Salley v. CIR, No. 71-3122 Summary Calendar.
...by the borrower. Cf. Guardian Investment Corp. v. Phinney, 5 Cir. 1958, 253 F.2d 326; Sharon Herald Co. v. Granger, 3 Cir. 1952, 195 F.2d 890; and see Deputy v. Du Pont, supra, where the Supreme Court discusses the business expense deductions of the predecessor of Section 162 (Section 23(a)......
Request a trial to view additional results