Sharp v. State
Decision Date | 02 January 1957 |
Docket Number | No. 28678,28678 |
Citation | 296 S.W.2d 932,164 Tex.Crim. 80 |
Parties | Roy Glen SHARP, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
C. S. Farmer, Waco, for appellant.
Tom Moore, Jr., Criminal Dist. Atty., Donald O. Hall, Asst. Criminal Dist. Atty., Waco, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
This is a conviction for driving an automobile while intoxicated upon a public highway; the punishment, a fine of $100 and three days in jail.
In his brief, appellant very frankly admits that the sole question here presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.In this connection it is insisted that the evidence nowhere shows that the appellant was the driver of the automobile.
The state's case depends upon the testimony of the witness Eades, a highway patrolman.He testified as follows:
The foregiong is the entire testimony of the state's witness under and by virtue of which it might be said that the state proved that the appellant was the driver of the automobile.
As a witness in his own behalf, the appellant testified as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Nelson v. State, 60967
...vehicle, Gamboa v. State, 481 S.W.2d 423 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Weldon v. State, 397 S.W.2d 859 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Sharp v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 80, 296 S.W.2d 932 (Tex.Cr.App.1957), that he drove while he was intoxicated, Gilder v. State, 474 S.W.2d 723 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), and that he drove on ......
-
Quiroz v. State
...and intoxication. He suggests that proof of that link "cannot be supplied by inference and supposition," citing Sharp v. State, 296 S.W.2d 932, 933 (Tex. Crim. App. 1957), and Gamboa v. State, 481 S.W.2d 423, 426 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972). The Kuciemba Court, however, emphasized that circumsta......
-
Johnson v. State, 49039
...the vehicle, Gamboa v. State, 481 S.W.2d 423 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Weldon v. State, 397 S.W.2d 859 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Sharp v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 80, 296 S.W.2d 932 (1957), that he drove while he was intoxicated, Gilder v. State, 474 S.W.2d 723 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), and that he drove on a publi......
-
Young v. State, 51991
...Gamboa v. State, 481 S.W.2d 423 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Weldon v. State, 397 S.W.2d 859 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Sharp v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 80, 296 S.W.2d 932 (1957). The State relies upon circumstantial evidence to sustain the conviction. It is well established that a conviction on circumstantial ......