Sharp v. State

Decision Date02 January 1957
Docket NumberNo. 28678,28678
Citation296 S.W.2d 932,164 Tex.Crim. 80
PartiesRoy Glen SHARP, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

[164 TEXCRIM 80]

C. S. Farmer, Waco, for appellant.

Tom Moore, Jr., Criminal Dist. Atty., Donald O. Hall, Asst. Criminal Dist. Atty., Waco, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for driving an automobile while intoxicated upon a public highway; the punishment, a fine of $100 and three days in jail.

In his brief, appellant very frankly admits that the sole question here presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.In this connection it is insisted that the evidence nowhere shows that the appellant was the driver of the automobile.

The state's case depends upon the testimony of the witness Eades, a highway patrolman.He testified as follows:

'I was patroling the road near Riesel * * * I observed the defendant and two other men, one of whom was named Simpson, in an old model Chevrolet automobile * * *.I saw this car weaving or wobbling and it pulled to the shoulder of the road and stopped.It looked like the defendant was trying to put something under the seat of the car.When the car started off from where it was parked on the shoulder of the road I pulled up with my siren on and their car stopped immediately and I stopped and got out of my car and got the defendant out of the other car and put him in my car.The defendant staggered and smelled of liquor.I brought the defendant to Waco in my car [164 TEXCRIM 81] and placed him in jail.All this occurred in McLennan County, Texas.As to whether or not he was drunk, in my opinion he was under the influence of intoxicating liquor.I found a part of a half pint of whiskey in their car.The bottle of whiskey you hand me is the whiskey I took out of the front of their car.'

The foregiong is the entire testimony of the state's witness under and by virtue of which it might be said that the state proved that the appellant was the driver of the automobile.

As a witness in his own behalf, the appellant testified as follows:

'My name is Roy Glen Sharp.I work at an Humble Service Station here in Waco. I have been working for the Humble Oil & Refining Company 23 years.I have not drunk any intoxicating liquors for a long time on account of an ulcerated stomach.I take some pills for my stomach that were prescribed by a Doctor and had been taking...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
6 cases
  • Nelson v. State, 60967
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 3, 1982
    ...vehicle, Gamboa v. State, 481 S.W.2d 423 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Weldon v. State, 397 S.W.2d 859 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Sharp v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 80, 296 S.W.2d 932 (Tex.Cr.App.1957), that he drove while he was intoxicated, Gilder v. State, 474 S.W.2d 723 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), and that he drove on ......
  • Quiroz v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 25, 2013
    ...and intoxication. He suggests that proof of that link "cannot be supplied by inference and supposition," citing Sharp v. State, 296 S.W.2d 932, 933 (Tex. Crim. App. 1957), and Gamboa v. State, 481 S.W.2d 423, 426 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972). The Kuciemba Court, however, emphasized that circumsta......
  • Johnson v. State, 49039
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • January 8, 1975
    ...the vehicle, Gamboa v. State, 481 S.W.2d 423 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Weldon v. State, 397 S.W.2d 859 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Sharp v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 80, 296 S.W.2d 932 (1957), that he drove while he was intoxicated, Gilder v. State, 474 S.W.2d 723 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), and that he drove on a publi......
  • Young v. State, 51991
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 22, 1976
    ...Gamboa v. State, 481 S.W.2d 423 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Weldon v. State, 397 S.W.2d 859 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Sharp v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 80, 296 S.W.2d 932 (1957). The State relies upon circumstantial evidence to sustain the conviction. It is well established that a conviction on circumstantial ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT