O'SHAUGHNESSY v. United States
Decision Date | 05 February 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 4819.,4819. |
Citation | 17 F.2d 225 |
Parties | O'SHAUGHNESSY et al. v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
J. H. Webb and Samuel M. Johnston, both of Mobile, Ala., for plaintiffs in error.
Nicholas E. Stallworth, U. S. Atty, of Mobile, Ala.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
The indictment in this case charged 71 persons with conspiring to sell intoxicating liquors in Mobile, Ala., in violation of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138¼ et seq.); the alleged conspiracy including the obtaining for those engaged in such selling immunity from arrest for so doing. Six of the accused pleaded guilty. The trial of 62 of them began April 28, 1924, and the case went to the jury on May 21, 1924, without counsel on either side making any argument to the jury. Eleven of the accused were convicted, including Patrick J. O'Shaughnessy, who was chief of police of Mobile during the time of the alleged conspiracy, and George L. Donoghue, who during that time was chief deputy of the sheriff of Mobile county. The case is before us on writs of error sued out by O'Shaughnessy and Donoghue.
Many assignments of error are made in behalf of each of them. We find it necessary to discuss only those assignments of error which are based on exceptions to parts of the court's charge to the jury. In that charge the presiding judge recited at length much of the testimony in support of the charge made, and stated his conclusions as to the guilt or innocence of the several accused. Exceptions were reserved to the following, among other, parts of that charge:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Toner
...error permitted his confession to be used to show his guilt of the conspiracy. See IV Wigmore, Section 1076. In O'Shaughnessy v. United States, 5 Cir., 1927, 17 F.2d 225, 227, the court was held to have exceeded the bounds of discretion in referring to the co-defendant's plea in his charge.......
-
United States v. Meltzer
...* * *. Since the ultimate conclusion was left to the jury, there was no error in the instruction. * * *" Fifth Circuit, O'Shaughnessy v. U. S., 17 F.2d 225, 228: "While it is permissible for a federal judge, presiding in the trial of a criminal case, to comment on the evidence and to expres......
-
State v. Kerley
...plea. Babb v. United States, 5 Cir., 218 F.2d 538; United States v. Toner, supra; United States v. Hall, supra; O'Shaughnessy v. United States, 5 Cir., 17 F. 2d 225. Where two or more persons are jointly tried, the extrajudicial confession of one defendant may be received in evidence over t......
-
State v. Cameron
...(C.C.A.5th); United States v. Toner, (173 F.2d 140 (C.C.A.3rd)); United States v. Hall, (178 F.2d 853 (C.C.A.2nd)); O'Shaughnessy v. United States, 17 F.2d 225 (C.C.A.5th). 'Reference is made to the cases cited in two Annotations: 48 A.L.R.2d 1004; 48 A.L.R.2d 1016. In the latter, the annot......