Shaw v. Agri-Mark, Inc., AGRI-MAR

Decision Date02 August 1995
Docket NumberINC,D,AGRI-MAR,No. 1038,1038
Citation67 F.3d 18
PartiesKaren SHAW and Forrest Foster, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v., Defendant-Appellant. ocket 94-7713.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Robert A. Gensburg, St. Johnsbury, Vermont (Peter Welch, Welch, Graham & Manby, White River Junction, Vermont, on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Robert B. Hemley, Burlington, Vermont (Gravel & Shea, Burlington, Vermont, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: LUMBARD, KEARSE, and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Agri-Mark, Inc. ("Agri-Mark"), a corporation organized for the purpose of processing, handling, and marketing milk and milk products of farmers in the New England states and New York, has appealed a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont which orders Agri-Mark to allow plaintiffs Karen Shaw and Forrest Foster to inspect certain of Agri-Mark's books and records. Agri-Mark is a stock corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. Plaintiffs are among the members of the Agri-Mark cooperative who supply Agri-Mark's equity capital and directly elect its directors; but they are not stockholders of record. Persons who are not stockholders of a corporation have no right under Delaware statutory law to inspect the corporation's books and records. See, e.g., Rainbow Navigation, Inc. v. Pan Ocean Navigation, Inc., 535 A.2d 1357, 1360 (Del.1987) (interpreting 8 Del.C. Sec. 220). The district court's judgment granting plaintiffs access to the books and records of Agri-Mark was based on the court's interpretation of Delaware common law.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether nonstockholder members of a Delaware stock corporation have the right under Delaware common law to inspect the corporation's books and records. In Shaw v. Agri-Mark, Inc., 50 F.3d 117 (2d Cir.1995), familiarity with which is assumed, we certified the following questions to the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware pursuant to that Court's Rule 41:

(1) Did persons who supplied equity capital to a cooperative stock corporation and directly elected its directors, but who were not stockholders of record, have a right under Delaware common law to inspect the corporation's books and records?

(2) If the answer to question (1) is yes, did that right survive the enactment of 8 Del.C. Sec....

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • U.S. v. Nachamie
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 22, 2000
  • 1997 -NMSC- 11, Schein v. Northern Rio Arriba Elec. Co-op., Inc.
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • January 16, 1997
    ...Minn. 1, 273 N.W. 603, 605-06 (1937) (upholding corporate records access rights for member of cooperative); cf. Shaw v. Agri-Mark, Inc., 67 F.3d 18, 19 (2d Cir.1995) (per curiam). ¶13 The determination of what constitutes improper purpose in requesting corporate information is an issue of f......
  • U.S. v. Carpenter
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • August 1, 2000
  • U.S. v. Bruder, 98 CR 196.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • June 27, 2000
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT