Shaw v. Library of Congress, No. 82-1019

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
Writing for the CourtBefore ROBINSON, Chief Judge, WALD and GINSBURG; SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III; GINSBURG
Citation747 F.2d 1469,241 U.S.App.D.C. 355
Parties36 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 284, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,859, 241 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 53 USLW 2257 Tommy SHAW v. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, et al., Appellants.
Decision Date13 November 1984
Docket NumberNo. 82-1019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 practice notes
  • Walia v. Vivek Purmasir & Associates, Inc., No. 95-CV-2428 (RJD).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • 15 Noviembre 2000
    ...670 F.2d 760, 764 n. 6 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 956, 103 S.Ct. 2428, 77 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1983); Shaw v. Library of Congress, 747 F.2d 1469, 1475 (D.C.Cir. 1984), rev'd on other grounds, 478 U.S. 310, 106 S.Ct. 2957, 92 L.Ed.2d 250 (1986), resulting in a total award of attorney's ......
  • Amico v. New Castle County, Civ. A. No. 82-513 CMW.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Delaware)
    • 11 Febrero 1987
    ...and no adjustment for delay should be allowed. Id. at 1329. See also 641 F.2d at 893 n. 23. See, e.g., Shaw v. Library of Congress, 747 F.2d 1469, 1472-73 (D.C.Cir.1984), rev'd. sub. nom., Library of Congress v. Shaw, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 2957, 92 L.Ed.2d 250 (1986) (on grounds that incr......
  • Library of Congress v. Shaw, No. 85-54
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 1 Julio 1986
    ...as compensation for delay. Both interest and a delay factor are designed to compensate for the belated receipt of money. Pp. 321-323. 241 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 747 F.2d 1469, reversed and remanded. BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and WHITE, POWELL, REHNQ......
  • Loeffler v. Frank, No. 86-1431
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 13 Junio 1988
    ...v. County of Erie, 751 F.2d 79, 82 (CA2 1984) (interest allowed on backpay award under Equal Pay Act); Shaw v. Library of Congress, 241 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 361, 747 F.2d 1469, 1475 (1984) (interest allowed on Title VII attorney's fees award), rev'd on other grounds, 478 U.S. 310, 106 S.Ct. 29......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • Walia v. Vivek Purmasir & Associates, Inc., No. 95-CV-2428 (RJD).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • 15 Noviembre 2000
    ...670 F.2d 760, 764 n. 6 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 956, 103 S.Ct. 2428, 77 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1983); Shaw v. Library of Congress, 747 F.2d 1469, 1475 (D.C.Cir. 1984), rev'd on other grounds, 478 U.S. 310, 106 S.Ct. 2957, 92 L.Ed.2d 250 (1986), resulting in a total award of attorney's ......
  • Amico v. New Castle County, Civ. A. No. 82-513 CMW.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Delaware)
    • 11 Febrero 1987
    ...and no adjustment for delay should be allowed. Id. at 1329. See also 641 F.2d at 893 n. 23. See, e.g., Shaw v. Library of Congress, 747 F.2d 1469, 1472-73 (D.C.Cir.1984), rev'd. sub. nom., Library of Congress v. Shaw, ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 2957, 92 L.Ed.2d 250 (1986) (on grounds that incr......
  • Library of Congress v. Shaw, No. 85-54
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 1 Julio 1986
    ...as compensation for delay. Both interest and a delay factor are designed to compensate for the belated receipt of money. Pp. 321-323. 241 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 747 F.2d 1469, reversed and remanded. BLACKMUN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BURGER, C.J., and WHITE, POWELL, REHNQ......
  • Loeffler v. Frank, No. 86-1431
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 13 Junio 1988
    ...v. County of Erie, 751 F.2d 79, 82 (CA2 1984) (interest allowed on backpay award under Equal Pay Act); Shaw v. Library of Congress, 241 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 361, 747 F.2d 1469, 1475 (1984) (interest allowed on Title VII attorney's fees award), rev'd on other grounds, 478 U.S. 310, 106 S.Ct. 29......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT