Shaw v. Patton
| Docket Number | 15-6106 |
| Decision Date | 18 May 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
43 cases
-
People ex rel. T.B.
...report changes to employment, appearance, or residence, but did not prevent offenders from making such changes); Shaw v. Patton, 823 F.3d 556, 568-69 (10th Cir. 2016) (concluding that "in-person reporting requirements are burdensome; but under our precedents, the burden is not so harsh that......
-
Doe v. Lee
...in circumstances where it is constitutional. Id. at 761-62. Defendants rely heavily on the out-of-circuit case of Shaw v. Patton , 823 F.3d 556, 568-69 (10th Cir. 2016), in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment. The court there rejected an ex post facto challenge to Oklahoma's Sex Of......
-
Hope v. Comm'r of Ind. Dep't of Corr.
...Michigan's version of SORA retroactive because it applied to offenders convicted prior to the law's enactment), and Shaw v. Patton , 823 F.3d 556, 560 (10th Cir. 2016) (holding the same with respect to Oklahoma's version of SORA). While we recognize this tension, we need not—and do not—revi......
-
Doe v. Rausch
...challenge, "[a] statute is enforced retroactively if it governs conduct that preceded the statute's enactment." Shaw v. Patton , 823 F.3d 556, 560 (10th Cir. 2016) (citing Stogner v. California , 539 U.S. 607, 612–13, 123 S.Ct. 2446, 156 L.Ed.2d 544 (2003) ). The Court begins its analysis w......
Get Started for Free