Shcherbina v. Queens Nassau Nursing Home, Inc.

Decision Date20 October 2009
Docket Number2008-11681.
Citation66 A.D.3d 869,2009 NY Slip Op 7615,886 N.Y.S.2d 620
PartiesSHILYA SHCHERBINA, Respondent, v. QUEENS NASSAU NURSING HOME, INC., Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was, in effect, to vacate the dismissal of the action pursuant to CPLR 3216 and to restore the action to the active calendar is denied.

In a compliance conference order dated April 1, 2003, the Supreme Court directed the plaintiff to file a note of issue on or before July 1, 2003, and warned that the action would be dismissed if the plaintiff failed to comply. Counsel for the plaintiff signed the order. This order had the same effect as a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216 (see Felix v County of Nassau, 52 AD3d 653 [2008]; Anjum v Karagoz, 48 AD3d 605 [2008]; Hoffman v Kessler, 28 AD3d 718 [2006]). The plaintiff failed to comply with this order either by filing a timely note of issue or by moving to extend the period for doing so, and the action was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3216 (see Felix v County of Nassau, 52 AD3d 653, 653-654 [2008]; Anjum v Karagoz, 48 AD3d 605 [2008]). Since the plaintiff waited three years to move to vacate the dismissal of the action, the motion was untimely and should have been denied (see Vinikour v Jamaica Hosp., 2 AD3d 518, 519 [2003]).

RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and HALL, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Bhatti v. Empire Realty Assocs., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 26, 2012
    ...receipt thereof. This order had the same effect as a 90–day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216 ( see Shcherbina v. Queens Nassau Nursing Home, Inc., 66 A.D.3d 869, 886 N.Y.S.2d 620;Anjum v. Karagoz, 48 A.D.3d 605, 852 N.Y.S.2d 354). Therefore, the plaintiffs were required either to serve and file......
  • Wold v. City of N.Y.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 7, 2011
    ...to extend the time to file a note of issue ( see Polizzi v. Burke, 72 A.D.3d 781, 782, 898 N.Y.S.2d 488; Shcherbina v. Queens Nassau Nursing Home, Inc., 66 A.D.3d 869, 886 N.Y.S.2d 620; Vinikour v. Jamaica Hosp., 2 A.D.3d 518, 519, 767 N.Y.S.2d 873). DILLON, J.P., COVELLO, BALKIN, LOTT and ......
  • Stroll v. Long Island Jewish Med. Ctr.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 7, 2017
    ...30 N.Y.S.3d 838 ; Rocha–Silva v. St. John's Hosp., 70 A.D.3d 1025, 894 N.Y.S.2d 767 ; Shcherbina v. Queens Nassau Nursing Home, Inc., 66 A.D.3d 869, 886 N.Y.S.2d 620 ; Anjum v. Karagoz, 48 A.D.3d 605, 852 N.Y.S.2d 354 ; Bokhari v. Home Depot U.S.A., 4 A.D.3d at 381–382, 771 N.Y.S.2d 395 ).T......
  • Carrington-White v. Malvey
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 20, 2009
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT