Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co., 7 Div. 652.
Decision Date | 22 January 1942 |
Docket Number | 7 Div. 652. |
Citation | 5 So.2d 808,242 Ala. 249 |
Parties | SHEARS v. ALL STATES LIFE INS. CO. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; Lamar Field Judge.
Chas. F. Douglass, of Anniston, and Horace C Wilkinson, of Birmingham, for appellant.
Knox Liles, Jones & Blackmon, of Anniston, for appellee.
This action is to recover total and permanent disability benefits claimed to be due under a group policy of insurance and certificate issued by appellee, defendant in the court below on April 1, 1929, upon the life of appellant, N.C. Shears, plaintiff in the court below, and other employees of the Southern Manganese Corporation, and kept in force by its successor corporations, including the Monsanto Chemical Company, by whom appellant was employed at the time he allegedly became permanently and totally disabled.
The master or group policy is referred to as master policy No. 103-G. A certificate numbered 273, insuring the life of appellant for $1,000, under the terms of the master policy, was issued and delivered to appellant on April 1, 1929, and a rider was afterwards issued and attached to the master policy and certificate numbered 273, increasing appellant's insurance to $2,000, as of April 1, 1928. The master policy and certificate contained a provision for "permanent total disability benefits," as hereinafter indicated.
Appellant rested its defense upon the theory that appellant's employment by the Monsanto Chemical Company, hereinafter called the employer, terminated either on June 15, 1938, or August 31, 1938, or that the policy and certificate sued on were cancelled as of June 30, 1938, by an agreement between appellee and employer, entered into on July 1, 1938; and that the appellant failed to furnish appellee with due proof of his disability before the policy was cancelled or before the termination of his employment.
The trial court gave the general affirmative charge, without hypothesis, for the appellee.
The pertinent provisions of the policy are:
On May 15, 1938, the employer paid to appellee the annual premium on master policy No. 103-G, subject to adjustments provided for in the policy, for the year beginning April 1, 1938, and ending March 31, 1939, listing all employees covered as of April 1, 1938, including appellant.
On July 1, 1938, at the request of the employer, the appellee cancelled the master policy (No. 103-G) as of midnight June 30, 1938. The record is silent as to whether or not appellant was notified of the intended cancellation, but it does appear that the trial court rejected an offer of proof that he received no such notice from either the appellee or employer, and there is no evidence that he consented to it.
Appellant testified that on June 15, 1938, Mr. O'Neal, employer's superintendent, called appellant to the superintendent's office and advised him, Appellant further testified And further, that
Clearly the evidence presented a question for the jury as to whether or not appellant was, prior to June 30, 1938, wholly disabled by bodily injury or disease, and will be continuously and wholly prevented thereby for life from engaging in any occupation or employment for wage or profit, within the meaning of the policy, and the decisions of this court. See Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Clyde Danley, Ala.Sup., 5 So.2d 743; United States Casualty Co. v. Perryman, 203 Ala. 212, 82 So. 462; Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Plaster, 210 Ala. 607, 98 So. 909; New York Life Ins. Co. v. McLean, 218 Ala. 401, 118 So. 753; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Blue, 222 Ala. 665, 133 So. 707, 79 A.L.R. 852; New...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Ins. Co., Inc.
...later seek to assert. E.g., American Auto. Ins. Co. v. English, 266 Ala. 80, 94 So.2d 397, 402 (1957); Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co., 242 Ala. 249, 5 So.2d 808, 816 (1942). In particular, defenses which are capable of being waived under the above principle are those that arise out of a......
-
Presley v. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama
...pays part of the premium. Harrison v. Insurance Company of North America, 294 Ala. 387, 318 So.2d 253 (1975); Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co., 242 Ala. 249, 5 So.2d 808 (1942). In light of Harrison, the court cannot conclude that "constructive notice" due to the employer's failure to wit......
-
Pan Coastal Life Ins. Co. v. Malone
...of liability on grounds other than failure to furnish proofs of loss operates as a waiver of notice of proof. Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co., 242 Ala. 249, 5 So.2d 808; Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Plaster, 210 Ala. 607, 98 So. In 45 C.J.S. Insurance § 1004, pp. 1229, 1230, the rule in respec......
-
Walker v. Occidental Life Ins. Co.
...that the employee is entitled to receive notice that the employer has terminated their relationship. (Shears v. All State Life Ins. Co. (1942) 242 Ala. 249, 5 So.2d 808, 814; Emerick v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. (1935) 120 Conn. 60, 179 A. 335, 337--338, 105 A.L.R. 413; Leavens v. M......