Sheboygan Co v. Parker

Decision Date01 December 1865
Citation70 U.S. 93,18 L.Ed. 33,3 Wall. 93
PartiesSHEBOYGAN CO. v. PARKER
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

THE constitution of Wisconsin ordains that 'all county officers shall be elected by the electors of the respective counties.' With this fundamental law in force, and with a county board of supervisors in existence, who, under the constitution and laws, were the ordinary administrators of its affairs, the legislature of the State, by 'an act to authorize the County of Sheboygan to aid in the construction of a railroad,' constituted Lewis Curtis, 'Billy Williams,' and three other persons less peculiarly entitled, a board of commissioners for aiding the project. The act directed a vote of the people of the county to be taken, as to whether or not they would have a subscription 'in pursuance of the act,' and then authorized these commissioners to borrow money on the credit of the county, and to issue its bonds therefor. The bonds were to be signed by the president and secretary of this board, and countersigned by the clerk of the regular county board of supervisors, or by the county treasurer; and it was declared that, when thus prepared and issued, they should, 'in the hands of any bon a fide holders, be of full and complete evidence to establish the indebtedness of the county according to their tenor and effect.'

A vote of the people having decided in favor of the railroad, the bonds were issued with interest warrants or coupons annexed. These were not in the exactly usual form of promises to pay, or of declarations that so much money was due the bearer, at the semi-annual dates; but were drafts by 'Lewis Curtis, President of the Board of the Sheboygan County Railroad Commissioners,' on 'the Treasurer of the County of Sheboygan,' in favor of the bearer for so much, and was signed by Williams as 'secretary.'

A number of the warrants being due and unpaid, in the possession of one Parker, a bon a fide holder, he sued the county, under its legal and corporate name of 'The County Board of Supervisors of Sheboygan County,' in the Circuit Court of Wisconsin, to enforce a payment of them.

On error from that court, where judgment was given against the county, the question was, whether the act constituting the new board was constitutional, and the county bound?- Messrs. J. S. Brown, Buttrick, and Hill, for the County, plaintiff in error. No persons but county officers can govern the county and regulate its affairs. True in all cases, this is certainly not least true in so important a matter as borrowing money, and binding the county by bonds to pay it back. These five persons were not 'elected by the electors of the county,' as the constitution requires county officers to be.

What are they? They are a corporation created for the purpose of aiding in the construction of a railroad. But by the principles of every free government, and of the constitution of Wisconsin, it is not in the power of the legislature to authorize one corporation to create a debt for another without the consent, express or implied, of the party to be charged. The bonds were issued by the new, excrescent, or 'outside' board, on their own motion, and without the consent of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
49 cases
  • United States v. Donziger
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 22 Junio 2022
    ...the duties of the position must be more than incidental to the regular operations of government.5 See Sheboygan County v. Parker , 70 U.S. (3 Wall.) 93, 96, 18 L.Ed. 33 (1865) (stating that the occupant of a position was not an officer because he did not exercise "continuously, and as a par......
  • State, By Mitchell, Attorney-General, ex rel. Garrison v. McLaurin
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 17 Noviembre 1930
    ...Dictionary, and is supported by the weight of judicial authority, including the Supreme Court of the United States. In Sheboygan County v. Parker, 3 Wall. 93, 18 L.Ed. 33, court held that the discharge of public duties does not make the person discharging them a public officer unless they a......
  • State ex rel. Buchanan County v. Imel
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 23 Abril 1912
    ... ... the county performs its usual political functions, its ... function of government." [ Sheboygan County v ... Parker, 70 U.S. 93, 96, 18 L.Ed. 33.] ...          The ... Constitution of Tennessee contains a provision that "no ... ...
  • Evans v. Beattie
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 18 Octubre 1926
    ...of a public station, permanent in character, created by law, whose incidents and duties were prescribed by law. ***" In Sheboygan County v. Parker, supra, certain persons were by an act of the Legislature to subscribe on behalf of a county to stock in a railroad and issue bonds of the count......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT