Shefa Trading III, LLC v. E.N.Y. Plaza, LLC

• Decision Date: 17 March 2021
• Docket Number: 2018-10560,2018-10506,Index No. 502441/15
• Citation: Shefa Trading III, LLC v. E.N.Y. Plaza, LLC, 192 A.D.3d 937, 140 N.Y.S.3d 724(Mem) (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
• Parties: SHEFA TRADING III, LLC, appellant, v. E.N.Y. PLAZA, LLC, respondent.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

192 A.D.3d 937

140 N.Y.S.3d 724 (Mem)

SHEFA TRADING III, LLC, appellant,

v.E.N.Y. PLAZA, LLC, respondent.

2018-10506

2018-10560

Index No. 502441/15

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Argued—February 2, 2021

March 17, 2021

Mischel & Horn, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Scott T. Horn of counsel), for appellant.

Alexander T. Singer, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP [Robert A. Spolzino ], of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence Knipel, J.), dated August 3, 2018, and (2) an order of the same court dated September 7, 2018. The order dated August 3, 2018, granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The order dated September 7, 2018, insofar as appealed from, granted the defendant's motion to discharge and cancel the notice of pendency filed in the action.

ORDERED that the order dated August 3, 2018, is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order dated September 7, 2018, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.

On July 12, 2004, Samuel Fleischman, Avi Shriki, and Mordechai Danino executed an operating agreement, whereby they formed E.N.Y. Plaza, LLC, a limited liability company (hereinafter the defendant). Fleischman, Shriki, and Mordechai Danino each held a one-third interest in the defendant, the sole asset of which is a building located in Brooklyn (hereinafter the subject property).

Paragraph 12 of the operating agreement provides, in sum and substance, that all decisions respecting the management, operation, and control of the defendant "shall be made by the unanimous vote or consent of the [m]embers." Further, Paragraph 13 expressly prohibits any member from, inter alia, transferring or disposing of all or any part of his interest in the defendant "without the prior written consent of the other [m]embers in each instance." In a written agreement dated January 5, 2012, the members consented to the transfer of Mordechai Danino's interest in the defendant to Alad Danino, thus making Alad Danino a member along with Fleischman and Shriki.

In April 2014, Fleischman negotiated a contract of sale on behalf of the defendant to sell the subject property to The Edge Realty Group, LLC (hereinafter The Edge). In November 2014, The Edge assigned all of its rights under the contract of sale to the plaintiff. Section 10.01(e) of the contract of sale required the written consent of the members as one of the defendant's closing obligations "to the extent required by the ... operating agreement."

In March 2015, the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant alleging, inter alia, that the defendant failed to perform its contractual obligations. After completion of discovery, the defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and to discharge the notice of pendency that had been filed by the plaintiff. In support of that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the defendant argued that the contract of sale could not be enforced, as Fleischman did not have either actual or apparent authority to unilaterally enter into the contract on the defendant's behalf. In an order dated August 3, 2018, the Supreme Court granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In an order dated September 7, 2018, the court granted the defendant's separate motion to discharge and cancel the notice of pendency filed in the action. The plaintiff appeals.

Here, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint by demonstrating that Alad Danino, Shriki, and Fleischman were the three members of the defendant, that the operating agreement required unanimous consent of the members to transfer or dispose...