Shefa Trading III, LLC v. E.N.Y. Plaza, LLC
Decision Date | 17 March 2021 |
Docket Number | 2018-10560,2018-10506,Index No. 502441/15 |
Citation | 192 A.D.3d 937,140 N.Y.S.3d 724 (Mem) |
Parties | SHEFA TRADING III, LLC, appellant, v. E.N.Y. PLAZA, LLC, respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
192 A.D.3d 937
140 N.Y.S.3d 724 (Mem)
SHEFA TRADING III, LLC, appellant,
v.
E.N.Y. PLAZA, LLC, respondent.
2018-10506
2018-10560
Index No. 502441/15
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Argued—February 2, 2021
March 17, 2021
Mischel & Horn, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Scott T. Horn of counsel), for appellant.
Alexander T. Singer, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP [Robert A. Spolzino ], of counsel), for respondent.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence Knipel, J.), dated August 3, 2018, and (2) an order of the same court dated September 7, 2018. The order dated August 3, 2018, granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The order dated September 7, 2018, insofar as appealed from, granted the defendant's motion to discharge and cancel the notice of pendency filed in the action.
ORDERED that the order dated August 3, 2018, is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order dated September 7, 2018, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.
On July 12, 2004, Samuel Fleischman, Avi Shriki, and Mordechai Danino executed an operating agreement, whereby they formed E.N.Y. Plaza, LLC, a limited liability company (hereinafter the defendant). Fleischman, Shriki, and Mordechai Danino each held a one-third interest in the defendant, the sole asset of which is a building located in Brooklyn (hereinafter the subject property).
Paragraph 12 of the operating agreement provides, in sum and substance, that all decisions respecting the management, operation, and control of the defendant "shall be made by the unanimous vote or consent of the [m]embers." Further, Paragraph 13 expressly prohibits any member from, inter alia, transferring or disposing of all or any part of his interest in the defendant "without the prior written consent of the other [m]embers in each instance." In a written agreement dated January 5, 2012, the members consented to the transfer of Mordechai Danino's interest in the defendant to Alad Danino, thus making Alad Danino a member along with Fleischman and Shriki.
In April 2014, Fleischman negotiated a contract of sale on behalf of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wolf v. Hollis Operating Co.
...agreement was insufficient to establish that he, in fact, held such authority as a matter of law (see Shefa Trading III, LLC v. E.N.Y. Plaza, LLC, 192 A.D.3d 937, 939, 140 N.Y.S.3d 724 ). Contrary to the defendants' further contention, neither the plaintiff's status as the decedent's son (s......
-
Ne. & Cent. Contractors, Inc. v. Quanto Capital, LLC
...issue of fact (see Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 231, 485 N.Y.S.2d 510, 474 N.E.2d 1178 ; Shefa Trading III, LLC v. E.N.Y. Plaza, LLC, 192 A.D.3d 937, 140 N.Y.S.3d 724 ; Matter of 121 Willow, LLC v. Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau, 181 A.D.3d 587, 589, 121 N.Y.S.3d......
-
Ne. & Cent. Contrs. v. Quanto Capital, LLC
... ... Shefa Trading III, LLC v E.N.Y. Plaza, LLC, 192 ... A.D.3d ... ...
- People v. Green