Shell Oil Co. v. Blumberg, 11452.

Decision Date22 March 1946
Docket NumberNo. 11452.,11452.
Citation154 F.2d 251
PartiesSHELL OIL CO., Inc., v. BLUMBERG et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Forney Johnston, of Birmingham, Ala., and Philip M. Payne, of New York City, for appellant.

O. S. Lewis, of Dothan, Ala., Thos. B. Hill, Jr., of Montgomery, Ala., and C. R. Shannon, of Mobile, Ala., for appellees.

Before SIBLEY, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action (1) for a declaratory judgment construing a leasing agreement that included an option to purchase the realty leased, (2) for specific performance of the contract, and (3) to set aside a sale of the property leased. The questions raised on appeal require an interpretation of the following provisions in said lease contract:

"Lessee is hereby given an option to purchase the above described premises during the term of this lease or any renewal period, for the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00). Lessee agrees, in the event it desires to exercise said option that it will give notice in writing, addressed and mailed to the last known address of Lessor, on or before thirty (30) days before said sale is to be completed; in which event Lessor agrees to convey said premises by warranty deed for the consideration above named, free and clear of any liens and encumbrances of whatsoever kind or character.

"If Lessor at any time during the term of this lease should desire to sell said property to a prospective purchaser, able, willing and ready to buy the same, Lessor shall so notify Lessee. Said notice shall give the name and address of the prospective purchaser and be accompanied by an affidavit by the Lessor that such prospective sale is bona fide, and that Lessor intends to sell and convey said property. Lessee shall thereupon have the right and option to purchase said property at the price and upon the terms offered by the prospective purchaser. Lessee agrees, in the event it desires to purchase, that it will within fifteen (15) days from the receipt of said notice signify its intention to buy said property and Lessor and Lessee will complete said sale with reasonable diligence and dispatch. Lessor to furnish abstract of title as hereinafter provided. In the event of a sale to any third party by the Lessor, and in the event such purchaser should thereafter desire to sell said property Lessee shall have the like option to purchase at the price offered by any bona fide prospective purchaser upon the same terms and conditions above set forth; it being understood that this right of the Lessee to purchase at the offered price shall be a continuing right during the existence of this lease whenever Lessor or any subsequent owner of the fee may desire to sell said property. Lessee's failure to exercise any option herein contained shall not in any way affect this lease or the rights of Lessee in the estate hereby created."

Upon taking possession of the leased premises, appellant erected a gasoline filling station thereon. On July 16, 1940, the appellee, Blumberg & Sons, submitted two separate and distinct written offers to a representative of the Bishop of Mobile, one to purchase the above realty for the sum of $20,000 cash; the other to purchase a lot on which was located a church building owned by the Bishop adjacent to and north of said leased premises, fronting 44 feet on North Oates Street, for the sum of $5,000 cash. In compliance with the terms of said lease contract, on August 7, 1940, the Bishop executed and mailed to appellant a notice of said offer on the leased premises, giving the name and address of the prospective purchaser, accompanied by an affidavit of good faith and his intention to sell, all in accordance with the provisions of the lease contract. By letter dated August 15, 1940, appellant advised the Bishop that it elected not to accept his offer to sell the leased premises, but stated that its rejection of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Doerr
    • United States
    • Superior Court of New Jersey
    • 11 Abril 1973
    ...97 F.Supp. 454 (D.Idaho 1951); Sinclair Refining Co. v. Martin, 38 Tenn.App. 66, 270 S.W.2d 576 (Ct.App.1954); Shell Oil Co. v. Blumberg, 154 F.2d 251 (5 Cir. 1946); Texaco, Inc. v. Rogow, 150 Conn. 401, 190 A.2d 48 None of the above cases is a persuasive precedent here. All are distinguish......
  • Shepherd v. Davis
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Virginia
    • 10 Enero 2003
    ...the lessee refuses to exercise a right of first refusal after being presented with a third-party offer. See e.g. Shell Oil Co. v. Blumberg, 154 F.2d 251, 252-53 (5th Cir.1946); Northwest Racing Ass'n v. Hunt, 20 Ill. App.2d 393, 156 N.E.2d 285, 288 (1959); Tarrant v. Self, 180 Ind.App. 215,......
  • Castrucci v. Young, 85-CV-0854
    • United States
    • Court of Common Pleas of Ohio
    • 4 Agosto 1986
    ...... Shell Oil Co. v. Prescott (C.A.6, 1968), 398 F.2d 592, certiorari denied (1969), 393 U.S. 1017, 89 S.Ct. ... There are cases supporting such a position. See Shell Oil Co. v. Blumberg (C.A.5, 1946), 154 F.2d 251; Texaco, Inc. v. Rogow (1963), 150 Conn. 401, 190 A.2d 48; Amoco Oil ......
  • McDonald's Corp. v. Lebow Realty Trust
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • 11 Abril 1989
    ...a right of first refusal and not otherwise defined, contemplates such a situation). This is also the teaching of Shell Oil Co. v. Blumberg, 154 F.2d 251, 252-53 (5th Cir.1946) and Shell Oil Co. v. Jolley, 130 Vt. 482, 296 A.2d 236, 241 (1972). In Blumberg, Shell refused to exercise its righ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT