Shelton v. United States
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | Shelton v. United States, 356 U.S. 26, 78 S.Ct. 563, 2 L.Ed.2d 579 (1958) |
| Decision Date | 10 March 1958 |
| Docket Number | M,No. 223,223 |
| Parties | Jay Paul SHELTON, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America. isc |
Jay Paul Shelton, pro se.
Solicitor General Rankin, for the United States.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and confession of error by the Solicitor General that the plea of guilty may have been improperly obtained, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
185 cases
-
People v. West
... ... in American criminal procedure, 'an integral part of the administration of justice in the United States' (Barber v. Gladden (D.C., 1963) 220 F.Supp. 308, 314), 'essential to the expeditious and ... 7 ... In Shelton v. United States (1957) 242 F.2d 101, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit held a guilty plea ... ...
-
US v. Mora-Gomez
... 875 F. Supp. 1208 ... UNITED STATES of America ... Rafael MORA-GOMEZ, Defendant/Petitioner ... Crim. A. Nos. 90-107-A, ... 742, 755, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 1472, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970) (emphasis added) (quoting Shelton v. United States, 246 F.2d 571, 572 n. 2 (5th Cir.1957), rev'd on other grounds, 356 U.S. 26, 78 ... ...
-
Woodard v. State
...312 U.S. 275, 61 S.Ct. 574, 85 L.Ed. 830; Waley v. Johnston, 316 U.S. 101, 62 S.Ct. 964, 86 L.Ed. 1302; Shelton v. United States, 356 U.S. 26, 78 S.Ct. 563, 2 L.Ed.2d 579. * * Machibroda, however, was a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C., § 2255, and does not purport to lay down a du......
-
Com. ex rel. Kerekes v. Maroney
... ... [2] Id. at 6, 222 A.2d 921; ... see Kercheval [423 Pa. 342] v. United ... States, 274 U.S. 220, 223--224, 47 S.Ct. 582, ... [223 A.2d 702] ... 583, 71 L.Ed. 1009 ... Cariola, 323 F.2d ... 180, 189 (3d Cir. 1963) (separate opinion of Biggs, C.J.); ... Shelton v. United States, 242 F.2d 101, 111--113 (5th Cir.), ... rev'd on rehearing, 246 F.2d 571 (5th ... ...
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Padilla v. Kentucky: the effect of plea colloquy warnings on defendants' ability to bring successful Padilla claims.
...bribes).'" (emphasis added) (quoting Shelton v. United States, 246 F.2d 571, 572 n.2 (5th Cir. 1957) (en banc), rev'd on other grounds, 356 U.S. 26 (1958))). (50.) See, e.g., United States v. Sambro, 454 F.2d 918, 922 (D.C. Cir. 1971) ("We note that the accused must be 'fully aware of the d......
-
THE DEFENDER GENERAL.
...in the United States by the middle decades of the twentieth century). (116) See Shelton, 242 F. 2d at 102. (117) Shelton v. United States, 356 U.S. 26, 26 (1958) (per (118) Albert W. Alschuler, Plea Bargaining and Its History, 79 COLUM. L. REV. 1, 36 (1979). Alschuler located the Solicitor ......
-
Significant entanglements: a framework for the civil consequences of criminal convictions.
...misrepresentation, or improper promises (citing Sbelton v. United States, 246 F.2d 571, 572 n.2 (5th Cir. 1957) (en banc), rev'd, 356 U.S. 26 (1958))). (252.) See Bustos v. White, 521 F.3d 321, 325-26 (4th Cir. 2008) (considering precedent regarding court's obligation to inform defendant of......
-
Lying at Plea Bargaining
...397 U.S. at 755 (quoting Shelton v. United States, 246 F.2d 571, 572 n.2 (5th Cir. 1957) (en banc), rev'd on other grounds per curiam, 356 U.S. 26 (1958)).118. Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(2).119. Id.; United States v. Wright, 43 F.3d 491, 495 (10th Cir. 1994) (finding that if the plea is the "pr......
Get Started for Free
