Shepherd v. Wellman, 01-5189.

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtKeith
Citation313 F.3d 963
PartiesBill Wayne SHEPHERD, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Billy WELLMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Docket NumberNo. 01-5189.,01-5189.
Decision Date23 December 2002
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
516 practice notes
  • Bumpas v. Corr. Corp. of America, 3:10-1055
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Tennessee
    • 30 Agosto 2011
    ...and, thus, a question may exist whether individual capacity claims against them are part of this action, see Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963 (6th Cir. 2002); Moore v. City of Harriman, 272 F.3d 769 (6th Cir. 2011); Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 593 (6th Cir. 1989), for the sake of complet......
  • Wilbur v. Tunnell, 19-P-922
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • 10 Julio 2020
    ...937 (7th Cir. 2007) ; 151 N.E.3d 914 Jones v. Correctional Med. Servs., Inc., 401 F.3d 950, 952 (8th Cir. 2005) ; Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963, 970-971 (6th Cir. 2002) ; Pridgen v. Andresen, 113 F.3d 391, 392-393 (2d Cir. 1997). The purpose of the general rule is to protect third-party......
  • Gray v. United States, 2:17-cv-02346-TLP-tmp
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Western District of Tennessee
    • 23 Agosto 2021
    ...a civil proceeding is not a constitutional right." Lanier v. Bryant , 332 F.3d 999, 1006 (6th Cir. 2003) ; see also Shepherd v. Wellman , 313 F.3d 963, 970 (6th Cir. 2002) ("[T]he plaintiffs were not entitled to have counsel appointed because this is a civil lawsuit."); Lavado v. Keohane , ......
  • Irvin v. Clarksville Gas & Water Dep't, Case No. 3:11-cv-00529
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Tennessee
    • 11 Agosto 2011
    ...individual capacity. See e.g. Burgans v. Hammond, No. 1:10-cv-334, 2011 WL 3325880 (E.D.Tenn. Aug. 2, 2011); see also Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963, 969 (6th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, considering Plaintiff filing this pro se, in forma pauperis action, the Magistrate Judge will liberally ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
516 cases
  • Bumpas v. Corr. Corp. of America, 3:10-1055
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Tennessee
    • 30 Agosto 2011
    ...and, thus, a question may exist whether individual capacity claims against them are part of this action, see Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963 (6th Cir. 2002); Moore v. City of Harriman, 272 F.3d 769 (6th Cir. 2011); Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 593 (6th Cir. 1989), for the sake of complet......
  • Wilbur v. Tunnell, 19-P-922
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • 10 Julio 2020
    ...937 (7th Cir. 2007) ; 151 N.E.3d 914 Jones v. Correctional Med. Servs., Inc., 401 F.3d 950, 952 (8th Cir. 2005) ; Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963, 970-971 (6th Cir. 2002) ; Pridgen v. Andresen, 113 F.3d 391, 392-393 (2d Cir. 1997). The purpose of the general rule is to protect third-party......
  • Gray v. United States, 2:17-cv-02346-TLP-tmp
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Western District of Tennessee
    • 23 Agosto 2021
    ...a civil proceeding is not a constitutional right." Lanier v. Bryant , 332 F.3d 999, 1006 (6th Cir. 2003) ; see also Shepherd v. Wellman , 313 F.3d 963, 970 (6th Cir. 2002) ("[T]he plaintiffs were not entitled to have counsel appointed because this is a civil lawsuit."); Lavado v. Keohane , ......
  • Irvin v. Clarksville Gas & Water Dep't, Case No. 3:11-cv-00529
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Tennessee
    • 11 Agosto 2011
    ...individual capacity. See e.g. Burgans v. Hammond, No. 1:10-cv-334, 2011 WL 3325880 (E.D.Tenn. Aug. 2, 2011); see also Shepherd v. Wellman, 313 F.3d 963, 969 (6th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, considering Plaintiff filing this pro se, in forma pauperis action, the Magistrate Judge will liberally ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT