Shiel v. Walker
| Decision Date | 06 November 1905 |
| Citation | Shiel v. Walker, 114 Mo. App. 521, 90 S.W. 124 (Mo. App. 1905) |
| Parties | SHIEL et al. v. WALKER. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Nodaway County; Alonzo D. Burnes, Special Judge.
Petition by A. Shiel and others against William H. Walker.From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to petitioners' evidence, they appeal.Affirmed.
Ira K. Alderman and Ramsay, Cummins & Aleshire, for appellant.J. S. Shinabargar, L. C. Cook, and George P. Wright, for respondent.
This is a proceeding begun under section 5217, Rev. St. 1899, to condemn lands for the enlargement of a public burial ground, and also, under section 5217a, Sess. Acts 1901, p. 54, to condemn an existing burial ground.The trial court sustained a demurrer to the evidence offered in behalf of the petitioners, and they appealed.
It appears that about 30 years ago defendant platted into burial lots about 2 acres of his farm; that the plat contained 200 lots of sufficient size for 8 graves or burials; that of these defendant has sold and deeded to various persons, up to the beginning of this proceeding 130 lots; that in 1903defendant laid off an addition to said burial ground of 2 acres, containing 150 lots, which are held for sale by him upon like terms as the original lots, though up to the beginning of this proceeding none had been sold.These petitioners, to the number of five, as before stated, seek to condemn the original grounds as a public burial ground, and to condemn the addition laid off thereto as an extension of such original grounds.The following are the sections of the statute referred to above:
Section 5217, Rev. St. 1899: "Whenever it shall become absolutely necessary to enlarge any public burial ground or cemetery, and when the public, to the number of five or more persons, interested in the enlargement of said burial grounds or cemetery, and the owner or owners of the adjoining land, cannot agree as to the price to be paid for the same, or for any other cause cannot secure a title thereto, the public, to the number of five or more persons, may proceed to condemn the same, in the same manner as provided by law for condemnation, appropriation and valuation, in cases of lands taken for telegraph and railroad purposes; and on such condemnation, and the payment of the appraisement...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
- The State Bank of Fox Lake v. Citizens' National Bank of King City
-
Normandy Consolidated (School) District of St. Louis County v. Harral
..."that the rule is only concerned with the time of the commencement of the vesting of the estate, and not with its duration." In Shiel v. Walker, 114 Mo.App. 521, the right of a person to plat and sell his land for cemetery purposes was recognized. Counsel for appellants admit that under Sec......
-
Newton v. Newton Burial Park
...Mo. 461; Mason v. Bloomington Library Assn., 86 N.E. 1046; Chapman v. Newell, 125 N.W. 327; Holeman v. Renard, 141 Mo.App. 399; Shiel v. Walker, 114 Mo.App. 521; In re Street Opening, 28 Am. St. 640; Town of Millford v. Commissioners of Worchester, 100 N.E. 60. (g) The articles of agreement......
-
City of Caruthersville v. Faris
...of the lots controlled by the owner and one unplatted and set apart for the free use of the public. Sec. 14066, R. S. 1929; Shiel v. Walker, 114 Mo.App. 521; Campbell City of Kansas, 102 Mo. 326; United Cemeteries Co. v. Strother, 332 Mo. 971, 61 S.W.2d 907; 14 L. R. A. 114. Ward & Reeves a......