Shiner v. Abbie
| Decision Date | 11 April 1890 |
| Citation | Shiner v. Abbie, 13 S.W. 613, 77 Tex. 1 (Tex. 1890) |
| Parties | SHINER <I>v.</I> ABBIE. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
J. M. Eckford, for appellant.
Appellee instituted this suit, charging that about the 20th day of August, 1884, the defendant inclosed six sections of land belonging to plaintiff, and that by the permission of plaintiff he has since that date occupied and enjoyed the use of said land, having promised to pay plaintiff the reasonable value thereof, which has been six cents per acre per annum. Defendant excepted to the petition, on the ground that, by it, it was sought to recover both upon an express and an implied contract, without stating facts sufficient to constitute either. We think the petition states a good cause of action upon an implied contract, and contains no allegations of an express contract. The exception was properly overruled.
A witness for plaintiff testified, over the objection of defendant, that some time in 1886 he was informed by one Johnson, who was plaintiff's agent, that "they could not lease the land to him because the defendant had it leased." We think this evidence should have been excluded. The fact that other evidence of the same character had been introduced without objection did not furnish a satisfactory reason for allowing plaintiff to introduce the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. Bailey
...rebuttal, to but in inadmissible testimony over timely and proper objection. Dolsen v. De Ganahl, 70 Tex. 620, 8 S.W. 321; Shiner v. Abbie, 77 Tex. 1, 13 S.W. 613; Massey v. Allen, Tex.Civ.App., 222 S.W. 682, 684, no writ history; Smith v. Burroughs, Tex.Civ.App., 34 S.W.2d 364, writ dism.;......
-
Dyess v. Rowe
...contract to bequeath the estate to appellee was alleged, and it could be sustained only by evidence of an express contract. Shiner v. Abbey, 77 Tex. 1, 13 S. W. 613. The express contract must have been made by Mrs. Rowe after the death of her husband, for the contract made by her, if any, w......
-
Ferguson v. Rhoades Drilling Co.
...of express contract. This rule is founded upon the elementary principal that the allegata and probata must correspond. Shiner v. Abbey, 77 Tex. 1, 2, 13 S. W. 613; Krohn v. Heyn, 77 Tex. 318, 14 S. W. 130; Thornton v. Moody (Tex. Civ. App.) 24 S. W. 332; Shelton v. Lemmon (Tex. Civ. App.) 2......
-
Morgan v. Gordon
...that the direction given to Waggoman was in the presence of appellee, a self-serving statement of an agent to his principal. Shiner v. Abbey, 77 Tex. 1, 13 S. W. 613; Providence-Washington Ins. Co. v. Owens (Tex. Civ. App.) 207 S. W. 666; Ætna Ins. Co. v. Richey (Tex. Civ. App.) 206 S. W. 3......