Ship v. State
| Decision Date | 18 May 1898 |
| Citation | Ship v. State, 45 S.W. 909 (Tex. Crim. App. 1898) |
| Parties | SHIP v. STATE. |
| Writing for the Court | Davidson |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Bowie county; Howard Templeton, Judge.
Richard Ship was convicted of rape, and he appeals. Reversed.
John J. King, for appellant. W. W. Walling and Mann Trice, for the State.
Appellant was convicted of rape, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five years; hence this appeal.
The prosecutrix testified that she had been on a visit to her grandfather, in the state of Tennessee, and was returning to her father's residence, in Delta county, in this state, on the train on which appellant was the porter. Shortly before reaching the town of Texarkana, she inquired of the conductor if her train would make connection with the train going from that point to Paris. She was informed that it would not, and that she would be compelled to spend the night in Texarkana. Upon reaching the depot at Texarkana, appellant approached the prosecutrix, and informed her that he would take her to a good place to spend the night. She agreed to go with him, he taking one of her bundles and she the other. After going a short distance, they ascended a flight of stairs, and found themselves in the rear room in the second story of a saloon building, where they spent the night together. She further testified that upon entering the room the defendant locked the door, and had intercourse with her. She says: She further says that he had intercourse with her without her consent. He did this three or four times during the night. She says that she tried to keep him from doing this all the time, and never did consent at any time. She further testified that after the first act of intercourse the defendant left the room, and was gone for some time and returned; that while he was gone she undertook to get out of the room, but the door was locked, and she did not succeed. The lock was described as being a spring lock that could be easily opened from the inside of the room, as it was only necessary to push the spring back in order to unlock it. On cross-examination, with reference to the defendant's action after they reached the room, she testified: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Company v. King
...The venue of an action may be proved in circuit court, on appeal from justice court, though it does not appear on the justice's record. 55 Ark. 282. BUNN, C. J. This is a suit for damages in the negligent killing of a horse by one of the trains of the defendant company. Judgment for plainti......