Shipley v. First Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n of Del.
Decision Date | 26 August 1985 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 84-521 CMW. |
Citation | 619 F. Supp. 421 |
Parties | John S. and Rochelle D. SHIPLEY, Plaintiffs, v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF DELAWARE (formerly known as First Federal Savings and Loan Association of New Castle County); Joseph B. Green, Esquire of Green & Green Law Offices; Michael P. Walsh, Sheriff of New Castle County, Delaware; and Margo Ewing Bane, Prothonotary of New Castle County, Delaware, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Delaware |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
John S. and Rochelle D. Shipley, pro se.
Frank J. Miller, of Miller & Foulk, Wilmington, Del., for defendant, First Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n of Delaware.
John A. Elzufon, of Elzufon & Bailey, Wilmington, Del., for defendant, Joseph G. Green, of Green & Green.
Theodore F. Sandstrom, of Wilmington, Del., for defendant, Michael P. Walsh, Sheriff of New Castle County, Del.
Brian A. Sullivan, Wilmington, Del., for defendant, Margo Ewing Bane, Prothonotary of New Castle County, Del.
This civil rights action for damages and injunctive relief arises out of efforts by First Federal Savings & Loan Association ("First Federal") to foreclose a mortgage held on property owned by the plaintiffs, John and Rochelle Shipley. Presently before the Court are separate motions for summary judgment by two of the defendants: the Sheriff of New Castle County, Michael Walsh, and the Prothonotary of New Castle County, Margo Ewing Bane. In addition, the Court has directed the parties to brief for possible summary judgment additional issues regarding the constitutionality of the notice provision which First Federal attempted to use in connection with its foreclosure procedure.
On July 19, 1978, the plaintiffs executed a mortgage, which named First Federal as the mortgagee, in connection with their purchase of property and a house located at 609 Wildel Avenue, Minquadale, New Castle, Delaware. D.I. 98 (Exhibit H).1 This mortgage was recorded thereafter in the Office for the Recording of Deeds in and for New Castle County, Delaware. A short time later, First Federal instructed its attorney, Joseph B. Green, to initiate foreclosure proceedings against the Shipleys for alleged non-payment on their mortgage. On January 21, 1981, an action was commenced in Superior Court by filing a complaint of scire facias sur mortgage. D.I. 97A (Exhibit 1).2 Apparently service was unsuccessful in that an alias summons was requested by Green on February 2, 1981. Shortly thereafter, First Federal directed Green to discontinue the foreclosure proceedings. D.I. 97:2.3 On August 12, 1983, some eighteen months after initiating the foreclosure proceedings, Green notified the Prothonotary of New Castle County to dismiss the action.
Within six months of the dismissal, First Federal had renewed its instructions to Green to bring a foreclosure action which Green filed on February 23, 1983. Once again, First Federal rescinded its instruction within a short time and once again, Green so notified the Prothonotary.
On May 4, 1983, a third foreclosure action on the Shipleys' property was commenced in Superior Court on a complaint of scire facias. It is the events arising out of this action that form the underlying basis of the Shipleys' claims. In connection with this third action, First Federal attempted to accomplish service by having a writ of scire facias sur mortgage served on the Shipleys by the Sheriff.
The Sheriff's affidavit offers the following account of the ensuing events:
The basic averments set forth in the Sheriff's affidavit are not disputed in plaintiffs' complaint. Plaintiffs allege that "service of process was attempted by Defendant, sic Walsh, his servants, agents, employees, or deputies" pursuant to Delaware Superior Court Civil Rule 4(f)(4) (hereinafter "Rule 4(f)(4)").5 D.I. 1:¶ 6. This rule provides that "in actions begun by scire facias, 2 returns without service of 2 consecutive writs shall constitute legal and sufficient service." This provision for constructive service became the basis on which the default judgment was entered in the scire facias proceeding by the Prothonotary pursuant to Delaware Superior Court Rule 55(b)(1) after receiving a request for entry of judgment from First Federal's attorney. D.I. 67:A-11.6 Plaintiffs maintain that they "were never served a summons nor were they ever notified of the existence of the mortgage foreclosure action." Id.
The Sheriff caused a circular to be posted in the Shipleys' yard in anticipation of the first sale that was scheduled for September, 1983 and this is how the Shipleys first learned that a default judgment had been entered.7 D.I. 1:¶ 6. The circular is captioned in bold large typeface — "SHERIFF'S SALE". It goes on to describe the Shipleys' property. The bottom of the circular contains the following bold faced print: "SEIZED AND TAKEN IN EXECUTION AS THE PROPERTY OF JOHN S. SHIPLEY AND ROCHELLE D. SHIPLEY, HIS WIFE, AND TO BE SOLD BY MICHAEL P. WALSH, SHERIFF." A notable feature of the circular is the absence of any notice to the homeowners, in this case the Shipleys, of the availability of any legal process to set aside the impending real estate transaction.
On January 24, 1984, the Shipleys filed in Delaware Superior Court a document captioned, "Petition for Relief from Judgment, or to Strike Judgment, or Declaratory Relief Stating that Judgment Was Never Entered, or to Stay Sheriff's Sale." D.I. 97:A (Exhibit 7). The purpose of the Petition was to set aside the default judgment that had been entered in early July of 1983, and to stay any further threatened sale of their property. The Petition was opposed by First Federal. A hearing was held before Superior Court Judge Bifferato and shortly thereafter, the Shipleys lodged a complaint against him in the Court of the Judiciary (a judicial disciplinary body in the State of Delaware), leading Judge Bifferato to recuse himself from the matter before him. D.I. 97:A (Exhibit 10).
The case was assigned to Judge Martin who on March 17, 1984 vacated and voided the default against the Shipleys, after he determined that the default judgment entered against them had been entered prematurely. D.I. 97:A (Exhibit 11). Judge Martin held that constructive service pursuant to Rule 4(f)(4) on the Shipleys was not achieved until June 28, 1983, and thus, the Shipleys should have been given twenty days after this date to respond before a default judgment was entered. This favorable decision for the Shipleys was appealed by them to the Delaware Supreme Court and that appeal was subsequently dismissed.
On April 17, 1984, First Federal, through its attorney Green, renewed its motion for a default judgment. D.I. 97:A ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Henry v. Farmer City State Bank
...S.Ct. 378, 24 L.Ed.2d 244 (1969) (public official acting pursuant to court directive is immune from suit); Shipley v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 619 F.Supp. 421, 439 (D.Del.1985) (sheriffs enjoy immunity when they act in either ministerial capacity or pursuant to order of judge); Dick v.......
-
McCann v. Scaduto
...County of Erie, 103 A.D.2d 636, 481 N.Y.S.2d 547; Bender v. City of Rochester, N.Y. [2nd Cir.], 765 F.2d 7; Shipley v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n. of Delaware, 619 F.Supp. 421; Harris v. Gaul, 572 F.Supp. 1554; Tracy v. County of Chester, 507 Pa. 288, 489 A.2d Despite Mullane and its offs......
-
Shipley v. First Federal S & L Ass'n of Delaware
...violated their civil rights; they seek damages and injunctive relief. Previously, in Shipley v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Delaware, 619 F.Supp. 421 (D.Del.1985) ("Shipley I"), this Court granted motions for summary judgment made by two of the original defendants, Michael......
-
Scott v. O'GRADY, 90 C 5810.
...official capacity as officers for the state. In support of their position, O'Grady and Branch cite Shipley v. First Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass'n of Delaware, 619 F.Supp. 421 (D.Del.1985). The Shipley court determined that a county sheriff and prothonotary acted in a ministerial capacity for the......