Shipman, Denny, Rhame & Co. v. Portland Const. Co.

Decision Date07 January 1913
Citation64 Or. 1,128 P. 989
PartiesSHIPMAN, DENNY, RHAME & CO. v. PORTLAND CONST. CO. et al.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; Henry E. McGinn, Judge.

Action by Shipman, Denny, Rhame & Co., a corporation, against the Portland Construction Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed in part, and modified.

The plaintiff is a California corporation of consulting engineers and the defendant Portland Construction Company is an Oregon corporation. On August 14, 1908, the Construction Company, as party of the first part, entered into a contract with the plaintiff, as party of the second part, by which it was provided in part: "That the said party of the first part being about to undertake the construction and installation of approximately two hundred miles of electric railroad in central Oregon, with the necessary appurtenances of dams power plants, transmission lines, etc., herewith engages the said party of the second part to serve as its engineers in the matter of the said construction and installation throughout the whole work from surveys to completion; and to have complete charge of all engineering matters, with the single exception of the structural steelwork of dams and bridges, upon the following terms and conditions: (1) That the party of the second part agrees to form a pool on or before September 1, 1908, to subscribe to $35,000.00 cash to be paid into the treasury of the Portland Construction Company, and for which the said Portland Construction Company agrees to deliver to the said pool $35,000.00 of its common stock, of the par value of one hundred dollars per share fully paid and nonassessable, and in addition thereto thirty 'participating certificates' of the Oregon Gold Prospecting & Promoting Company, carrying certain dividends or profits, all in accordance with a contract of even date between said Portland Construction Company and B. Carroll Shipman. (2) That it is fully understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the work covered by this contract is to be undertaken and prosecuted in sections or divisions, and that, for the purpose of estimate and payment, each section of the work is to be considered by itself, payments from the said party of the first part to the said party of the second part being made in accordance with the terms below, only upon such sections as may have been fully designed and set forth in the plans and specifications submitted. (3) That in consideration of services in securing the above-mentioned subscription on the part of Shipman, Denny, Rhame & Company party of the second part, to the stock of Portland Construction Company, and of the further services as engineers in accordance with this contract, the said Portland Construction Company, party of the first part, its assigns or successors, agrees to pay to the said Shipman, Denny, Rhame &amp Company, party of the second part, its assigns or successors, a total fee of five per cent. on the actual cost in labor and material of the electric railroad with all its appurtenances before mentioned except structural steelwork on bridges and dams; payment of the said five per cent. fee to be made as follows: Upon the presentation to the party of the first part, or its representative, of one complete set of plans and specifications with the estimate of cost of any section of the work as before mentioned (the first section being from Condon to John Day River), prepared as set forth below, a partial fee of $15,000.00 the said fee to be due and payable in cash at the time of the presentation of the plans and specifications; the balance of the above-mentioned five per cent. total fee to be paid in monthly installments in proportion to the work done, and based on engineer's estimates. It is expressly agreed and understood that the payments herein mentioned in any specific instance are to cover only that particular section of the work for which plans, specifications and estimates are submitted, and that payment for no more than one section shall be made until the contract is let for first section. (4) As the party of the first part desires to start the surveys of the first section of the work between Condon and the John Day River at once, before it is possible to obtain the actual payment of the above-mentioned $35,000.00 into the treasury of the Portland Construction Company, the party of the second part agrees to begin work at once and to prosecute it with all diligence in accordance with this contract, and it is hereby agreed and understood, that if the said Shipman, Denny, Rhame & Company shall not be able to cause to be delivered to the said treasury of the Portland Construction Company all of the said $35,000.00 in accordance with the foregoing provisions, then, and in that event, this contract shall be void and of no effect, except as hereinbefore provided, to wit, the said Shipman, Denny, Rhame & Company, party of the second part, agrees to subscribe for themselves to $7,000.00 worth of said stock of the Portland Construction Company, carrying with it six 'participating certificates' of the Oregon Gold Prospecting & Promoting Company and a proportionate amount of dividend stocks and bonds, the subscription to be paid for in cash or services, as elected by the said Shipman, Denny, Rhame & Company, and they further agree to use their best efforts to obtain subscriptions to as much of the $35,000.00 above-mentioned subscription, as possible, and in consideration of such subscription by the said Shipman, Denny, Rhame & Company, the said Portland Construction Company, party of the first part, hereby agrees to engage the services of the said Shipman, Denny, Rhame & Company as engineers of the first section to the John Day River, to wit, where said river intersects the north line of the land of Prineville Land & Livestock Company, about one and one-half miles above the mouth of Pine Creek only, of the above-mentioned electric railroad upon the same terms and conditions otherwise as stated in this contract for the complete work." The contract then provides in some detail what shall be performed by the plaintiff in the way of examining conditions, furnishing plans, specifications, bills of material, estimates of cost of construction, and equipment of the proposed road, and further provides as follows: "And upon presentation to the first party by second party of such plans, specifications, surveys, estimates, etc., for said section, second party shall be entitled to payment of the sum of $7,000.00 forthwith, unless second party shall have elected to pay its subscription of $7,000.00 par value of stock of first party in services in which event upon completion of such plans, etc., second party shall be entitled to be credited upon subscription the sum of $7,000.00, and failure to pay such subscription in cash on or before September 1, 1908, will be deemed an election to pay in services. If within two weeks after the presentation of such complete plans, etc., to first party actual construction work shall not have been commenced and prosecuted with reasonable diligence thereafter, then and in that event, there shall become due and payable to second party the further sum of $8,000.00, which payment when made will be in full and complete settlement and discharge of all liability to second party under this contract, if said railroad is not constructed, but if constructed by first party the second party shall be entitled to receive in the aggregate five per cent. of cost of labor and material as hereinbefore specified, and if construction work is begun within two weeks after the presentation to first party of said plans, etc., and such work is thereafter diligently prosecuted then and in that event second party shall be entitled to receive five per cent. of actual cost of labor and material of said first section to John Day River, from which shall be first deducted the sum of seven thousand dollars aforesaid, and the balance shall be paid in monthly installments as hereinbefore specified. And it is also agreed that as soon as surveys, etc., are completed from Condon to Mayville, second party shall deliver to first party such surveys, plans, estimates, etc., and again when said surveys are completed to Fossil, the surveys, etc., shall be delivered to first party in order to enable first party to prepare for construction work."

On September 20, 1909, the plaintiff filed a complaint against the other party to the contract, together with certain stockholders of the defendant Construction Company, and alleged, in substance, that the plaintiff had performed its part of the contract, and, although frequent demands had been made upon the Construction Company for the payment of the sum of $8,000 claimed to be due the plaintiff here under the contract, nothing had been paid except $4,050, and there was a balance due the plaintiff from the Construction Company amounting to $3,950, together with accrued interest. The complaint then goes on to state: "That prior to August 14, 1908, and subsequent to the incorporation of defendant Portland Construction Company, the defendants J.R. Bowles H.I. Keeney, Mark W. Gill, H.J. Martin, O.B. Hathaway, W.F. Hurlbert, J.H. Carpenter, and the defendant the Oregon Gold Prospecting & Promoting Company, subscribed for a certain amount of the capital stock of the defendant Portland Construction Company, but failed and neglected to fully pay for the same in accordance with their respective subscriptions, and that there now remains due and unpaid from the defendants last above named, on account of the unpaid subscription to the capital stock of the said company, an amount sufficient to pay the claim and demand of the plaintiff herein, but that the exact amount of the unpaid...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Reagan v. Midland Packing Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • April 22, 1924
    ... ... & S.R. Co., 120 Ill. 196, 11 ... N.E. 906; Shipman, Denny, Rhame & Co. v. Portland Const ... Co., 64 Or. 1, ... ...
  • Schramm v. Bank of California, Nat. Ass'n
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • April 11, 1933
    ... ... Or. 549] John P. Winter, of Portland (Winter & Maguire and ... Wilson & Reilly, all of ... 502, 127 P. 541, 130 ... P. 1131, 1132; Shipman v. Portland Const. Co., 64 ... Or. 1, 128 P. 989. In ... ...
  • Dryden v. Daly
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • June 25, 1918
    ... ... Public Utilities of the City of Portland, and others. From ... the decree rendered, defendants ... Scholl v. Belcher, 63 Or. 310, 127 P. 968; Shipman ... v. Portland Construction Company, 64 Or. 1, 128 P ... ...
  • Vermont Farm Mach. Co. v. Hall
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • April 25, 1916
    ... ... order of the Farmers' Implement Company of Portland, Or., ... a corporation, $1,700, with interest at 6 ... Hirschfeld v. McCullagh, supra; Shipman v ... Port. Const. Co., 64 Or. 1, 128 P. 989. While ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT