Shirley v. Howard

Decision Date31 January 1870
Citation53 Ill. 455,1870 WL 6234
PartiesWILLIAM C. SHIRLEYv.ENOCH HOWARD,WILLIAM C. SHIRLEYv.CORYDON WEED et al.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEALS from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. BENJAMIN S. EDWARDS, Judge, presiding.

The opinion gives a sufficient statement of these cases.

Messrs. ROBINSON, KNAPP & SHUTT, for the appellant.

Messrs. HAY, GREENE & LITTLER, for the appellees.

Mr. JUSTICE LAWRENCE delivered the opinion of the Court:

Both of these cases were actions upon promissory notes, brought by the endorsee against the maker. The only defense was, that the consideration of the notes was a wager on the last presidential election. It was held in Adams v. Wooldridge, 3 Scam. 255, that this was not a good defense against an assignee, taking the note in good faith, for a valuable consideration, before maturity. We see no reason for disregarding that authority.

Judgment affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Hart v. Livermore Foundry & Machine Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 3 June 1895
    ...279; 2 Randolph on Com. Paper, §§ 517, 518; Edwards on Bills and Notes, 337; Chitty on Bills, 116; Byles on Bills, 145; 21 Wall., 221; 53 Ill. 455; 70 N.C. 191; 31 N.H. 426; Ib., 32; 9 Neb. 31; 6 Wend., 616; 6 Hill, 499; 6 Hun, 384; 56 Mo. 317; Ib., 309. No title or lien passed to the First......
  • Toledo v. Seitz
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 31 January 1870

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT