Shirley v. Howard
Decision Date | 31 January 1870 |
Citation | 53 Ill. 455,1870 WL 6234 |
Parties | WILLIAM C. SHIRLEYv.ENOCH HOWARD,WILLIAM C. SHIRLEYv.CORYDON WEED et al. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
APPEALS from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. BENJAMIN S. EDWARDS, Judge, presiding.
The opinion gives a sufficient statement of these cases.
Messrs. ROBINSON, KNAPP & SHUTT, for the appellant.
Messrs. HAY, GREENE & LITTLER, for the appellees.
Both of these cases were actions upon promissory notes, brought by the endorsee against the maker. The only defense was, that the consideration of the notes was a wager on the last presidential election. It was held in Adams v. Wooldridge, 3 Scam. 255, that this was not a good defense against an assignee, taking the note in good faith, for a valuable consideration, before maturity. We see no reason for disregarding that authority.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hart v. Livermore Foundry & Machine Co.
...279; 2 Randolph on Com. Paper, §§ 517, 518; Edwards on Bills and Notes, 337; Chitty on Bills, 116; Byles on Bills, 145; 21 Wall., 221; 53 Ill. 455; 70 N.C. 191; 31 N.H. 426; Ib., 32; 9 Neb. 31; 6 Wend., 616; 6 Hill, 499; 6 Hun, 384; 56 Mo. 317; Ib., 309. No title or lien passed to the First......
- Toledo v. Seitz