Shoe Company v. Wolf Brothers Company, HAMILTON-BROWN
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Pitney |
| Citation | 36 S.Ct. 269,60 L.Ed. 629,240 U.S. 251 |
| Parties | SHOE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. WOLF BROTHERS & COMPANY |
| Docket Number | HAMILTON-BROWN,No. 37 |
| Decision Date | 21 February 1916 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
246 practice notes
-
Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.
...McDaniel, 418 So.2d 934, 935 (Ala.1982); Causey v. State, 374 So.2d 413, 414 (Ala. 1979). See also Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros., 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). Litigants who rely on opinions of intermediate appellate courts that conflict with opinions of the juris......
-
Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc., 2017-1591, 2017-1592, 2017-1593
...Theriot , 377 U.S. 152, 153–54, 84 S.Ct. 1157, 12 L.Ed.2d 206 (1964) (per curiam) (quoting Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co. , 240 U.S. 251, 257, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916) ); see also Major League Baseball Players Ass’n v. Garvey , 532 U.S. 504, 508 n.1, 121 S.Ct. 1724, 14......
-
Murrow v. Clifford, No. 73-1717
...(1973); Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank, 314 U.S. 63, 62 S.Ct. 15, 86 L.Ed. 47 (1941); Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co., 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916); 9 J. Moore, Federal Practice P110.25(2) (2d ed. 1973); 1B J. Moore, Federal Practice P0.404(10), at 574......
-
LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co., No. 300
...is used in an "arbitrary" or fictitious sense, it may be the subject of a valid trade-mark. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co., 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (The American Girl shoe); McIlhenny Co. v. Gaidry, 5 Cir., 253 F. 613 (Tabasco sauce); Century Distilling Co. v. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
238 cases
-
Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.
...McDaniel, 418 So.2d 934, 935 (Ala.1982); Causey v. State, 374 So.2d 413, 414 (Ala. 1979). See also Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros., 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). Litigants who rely on opinions of intermediate appellate courts that conflict with opinions of the juris......
-
Atlantic Monthly Company v. Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.
...2 Cir., 300 F. 706, certiorari denied 1924, 266 U.S. 607, 45 S.Ct. 92, 69 L.Ed. 465. 14 Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co., 1916, 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (The American Girl Shoe); LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co., 2 Cir., 157 F.2d 115, 116-117, certiora......
-
Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp., No. 16084
...present situations which make them particularly applicable to the factual situation here: Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co., 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629; Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Company v. S. S. Kresge Co., 316 U.S. 203, 62 S.Ct. 1022, 86 L.Ed. 1381......
-
Horlick's Malted Milk Corporation v. HORLUCK'S, INC, No. 657.
...213 F. 423; Singer Mfg. Co. v. June, 163 U. S. 169, 200, 16 S. Ct. 1002, 41 L. Ed. 118; Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co., 240 U. S. 251, 259, 36 S. Ct. 269, 60 L. Ed. 629; Matzger v. Vinikow (C. C. A.) 17 F.(2d) 581, 584; J. F. Rowley Co. v. Rowley (C. C. A.) 193 F. 390, 392; ......
Request a trial to view additional results