Shoppers Food Warehouse v. Moreno, 96-CV-21.

Decision Date04 January 1999
Docket NumberNo. 96-CV-21.,96-CV-21.
Citation722 A.2d 845
PartiesSHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE, Appellant, v. Asuncion MORENO, Appellee.
CourtD.C. Court of Appeals

Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, RUIZ, and REID, Associate Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en bane, and the answer thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en bane is granted and that the opinion and judgment of July 16, 1998, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en bane as soon as the calendar permits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that no later than February 1, 1999, the parties shall file new briefs specifically designed for consideration by and addressed to the en bane court. These new briefs shall address the analysis contained in the respective majority and dissenting opinions issued by the division. In addition, the new briefs shall incorporate all arguments that the parties wish to address to the en bane court and in that sense shall be considered replacements for, not supplements to, the briefs submitted to the division. Each party shall file ten copies of its brief. The parties may subsequently file responsive memoranda not later than February 15, 1999.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Shoppers Food Warehouse v. Moreno
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • 17 Febrero 2000
    ...(D.C. 1998) (Moreno I). The panel's opinion was vacated and Shoppers' petition for rehearing en banc was granted on January 4, 1999. 722 A.2d 845 (D.C.1999). After rehearing en banc, which we granted only to consider the jurisdictional issue,1 we reaffirm the trial court's judgment. We hold......
  • Olivarius v. Stanley J. Sarnoff Endowment
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • 9 Septiembre 2004
  • Jackson v. Loews Washington Cinemas, Inc., No. 03-CV-1048.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • 27 Marzo 2008
    ...opinion was later vacated, and Shoppers' petition for rehearing en banc was granted, but only to consider the jurisdictional issue. 722 A.2d 845 (D.C. 1999). 5. For example, one of the ads placed by Shoppers stated in bold lettering, "No Matter Where You Live ... It's Worth The Drive!" Shop......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT