Short v. Ness Produce Co
Decision Date | 01 October 1966 |
Docket Number | No. 779,779 |
Citation | 385 U.S. 537,17 L.Ed.2d 591,87 S.Ct. 742 |
Parties | James F. SHORT et al. v. NESS PRODUCE CO. , |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.
Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen. of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke and Don Parker, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.
J. Bradley Colburn and Theodore B. Jensen, for appellee.
Jan. 16, 1967.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. California Portland Cement Company
... ... property by applying the principle that each dollar of the total costs paid or incurred to produce, transport and sell the first marketable product or group of products earns the same percentage of ... ...
-
Tape Industries Association of America v. Younger
...395 U.S. 169, 89 S.Ct. 1648, 23 L.Ed.2d 182 (1969); Ness Produce Co. v. Short, 263 F.Supp. 586 (D.Or.1966), aff'd, 385 U.S. 537, 87 S.Ct. 742, 17 L.Ed.2d 591 (1967). Plaintiffs contend that the Supreme Court in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225, 84 S.Ct. 784, 11 L.Ed. 2d 661......
-
Sohappy v. Smith
...aff'd 390 U.S. 598, 88 S.Ct. 1260, 20 L.Ed.2d 158 (1968); Ness Produce Co. v. Short, 263 F.Supp. 586 (D.Or.1966), aff'd 385 U.S. 537, 87 S.Ct. 742, 17 L.Ed.2d 591 (1967). Neither the State of Washington nor any official thereof is an indispensable party to these actions. Fed.R.Civ.P. 19; Pr......
-
Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission
...the constitutional and non-constitutional issues. Ness Produce Co. v. Short, 263 F.Supp. 586, 588 (D.Ore. 1966) aff'd 385 U.S. 537, 87 S.Ct. 742, 17 L.Ed.2d 591 (1967); Sterling v. Constantin, 287 U.S. 378, 393-394, 53 S.Ct. 190, 77 L.Ed. 375 (1932). However, a properly convened three-judge......