Shriver v. Montgomery
Decision Date | 15 January 1914 |
Docket Number | 22,362 |
Citation | 103 N.E. 945,181 Ind. 108 |
Parties | Shriver et al. v. Montgomery, Administrator |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From Fulton Circuit Court; Smith M. Stevens, Special Judge.
Action by Orba F. Montgomery, administrator with the will annexed of Jesse Shriver, deceased, against Elias Shriver and others. From a judgment construing the will, the defendants appeal.
Reversed.
I Conner, for appellants.
James H. Bibler and Holman, Stephenson & Bryant, for appellee.
This was an action by appellee as administrator de bonis non with the will annexed, of Jesse Shriver, deceased against appellants as children, grandchildren, and a guardian of grandchildren of said Shriver, to procure a construction of the will. The transcript was filed in the Appellate Court, December 22, 1910. On the passage of the act of March 10, 1913 (Acts 1913 p. 454), the Appellate Court on March 20, 1913, transferred the cause to this court, and the clerk on his own motion, after the decision involving the act of 1913 in Curless v. Watson (1913), 180 Ind. 86, 102 N.E. 497, retransferred the cause to the Appellate Court, and that court on October 29, 1913, properly transferred the cause to this court where the jurisdiction is, under § 1392 Burns 1908, Acts 1907 p. 237.
The error assigned and presented is in the ruling on the complaint, the pertinent allegations of which are, that on the 21st day of November, 1908, appellee filed his current report, setting forth the state of his account as administrator to that date, and asked therein a construction of the will of the deceased, Jesse Shriver, so as to determine the proper and legal distributees of the will, to enable him to make a final distribution of the balance of the personal assets of the estate, which report was filed in the estate, assuming that the jurisdiction to construe the will properly belonged to the probate side of the court; an order of the court on the probate side, was made, directing that service be had upon the children and grandchildren of the deceased, to the end that the will might be construed, to determine to whom the personal assets of the estate should be distributed. Here follow allegations showing that each of the sons mentioned in the several items of the will are living, and have children who are each minors, naming them, except in the case of James who is alleged to have died since the death of his father, and after the probate of the will, and naming his children, all minors; that Ruth Clayton is a daughter of the decedent, Jesse Shriver, and has no children; that Franklin P. Shriver is a son of the decedent, Jesse Shriver, and has no children; that the provisions of the will and said judgment and decree of the court, hereinbefore referred to, are as follows:
The third, fourth and fifth items make the same provisions as to specifically described tracts of land in favor of his sons Elias, James and David, as in case of Oliver. "6th. I give and bequeath to my wife Mary C. Shriver, my brick residence in Akron, Fulton County, Indiana, and the land adjacent thereto, (particularly described and other particularly described lands) so long as she shall live and remain my widow. And in addition thereto I devise to my said wife of the personal property as follows: $ 500 in money to be paid to her by my said trustee, and the interest on $ 2,000 to be held by said trustee, and the interest thereon to be paid to her annually or as collected. Also I give and bequeath to her all the household and kitchen furniture. 7th. I further direct that my said trustee or his successor have and hold for the benefit of my grandchildren, all property remaining, and not herein specifically bequeathed, in trust for said grandchildren, until the youngest of my said grandchildren arrives at the age of 21 years, at which time the same is to become the property of said grandchildren, they to share equally therein.
That as a part of the settlement herein, it is agreed and the court therefore finds, that a son of the decedent, Franklin P Shriver, ought to have, and by agreement of parties hereto is to have, the use and benefit of the following described land, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial