Siegel v. Tamarack Lodge Hotel, Inc.
| Decision Date | 21 October 1974 |
| Citation | 360 N.Y.S.2d 78,46 A.D.2d 684 |
| Parties | Paul SIEGEL, Respondent, v. TAMARACK LODGE HOTEL, INC., Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Leo E. Berson, New York City (Adolph B. Salib, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Bobowick & Salenger, New York City, for respondent.
Before HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and COHALAN, BRENNAN, BENJAMIN and MUNDER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 22, 1974, which granted plaintiff's motion to vacate an order of dismissal, on condition that plaintiff file a note of issue and statement of readiness within 30 days after publication of the decision in the New York Law Journal and that all pretrial examinations and procedures be completed within 45 days after such publication.
Order modified by adding thereto the further condition that plaintiff's attorney personally pay defendant $250 costs. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The $250 must be paid within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon.
In view of the neglect of plaintiff's attorney in handling this action, we believe he should be required personally to pay $250 costs to defendant.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gabrelian v. Gabrelian
...v. R.H. Macy's & Co., 97 A.D.2d 535, 467 N.Y.S.2d 895; Bissaccia v. Aknin, 54 A.D.2d 681, 387 N.Y.S.2d 264; Siegel v. Tamarack Lodge Hotel, 46 A.D.2d 684, 360 N.Y.S.2d 78; Schickler v. Seifert, 45 A.D.2d 816, 357 N.Y.S.2d 225; Moscatiello v. Savarese, 42 A.D.2d 519, 344 N.Y.S.2d 285; Moran ......
-
Batista v. St. Luke's Hospital, Woman's Hospital Division
...against the offending attorney personally, so that the rights of the parties may be determined on the merits (Siegel v. Tamarack Lodge Hotel, 46 A.D.2d 684, 360 N.Y.S.2d 78; Cohen v. Tucker, 44 A.D.2d 706, 354 N.Y.S.2d 691; Moran v. Rynar, Supra; cf. Ballard v. Billings & Spencer Co., 36 A.......
-
Ostergard v. Carminati
...against the offending attorney personally, so that the rights of the parties may be determined on the merits (see Siegel v. Tamarack Lodge Hotel, 46 A.D.2d 684, 360 N.Y.S.2d 78; Cohen v. Tucker, 44 A.D.2d 706, 354 N.Y.S.2d 691; Moran v. Rynar, 39 A.D.2d 718, 332 N.Y.S.2d ...
-
Kimple v. Auble
...the performance of his obligations to his client and to the Court as an officer of the Court. For example, in Siegel v. Tamarack Lodge Hotel, Inc., 46 A.D.2d 684, 360 N.Y.S.2d 78, the plaintiff's attorney was directed to pay personally to defendant $250 costs, for the alleged neglect of sai......