Sikes v. Township of Rockaway
| Court | United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey) |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 648 A.2d 482,138 N.J. 41 |
| Parties | Donald R. SIKES, Jr., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TOWNSHIP OF ROCKAWAY and John C. Doll, Jr., Defendants-Appellants. |
| Decision Date | 27 October 1994 |
Page 41
v.
TOWNSHIP OF ROCKAWAY and John C. Doll, Jr., Defendants-Appellants.
Decided Oct. 27, 1994.
James J. Higgins, Morristown, for appellant (Boyar, Higgins & Suozzo, attorneys).
Page 42
Paul M. Selitto, Denville, for respondent (Pitman, Senesky, Nicola & Selitto, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 269 N.J.Super. 463, 635 A.2d 1004 (1994).
For Affirmance--Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN--7.
Opposed--None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
17 practice notes
-
Pinkowski v. Township of Montclair
...the governmental entity. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2e; Sikes v. Township of Rockaway, 269 N.J.Super. 463, 466, 635 A.2d 1004 (App.Div.), aff'd, 138 N.J. 41, 648 A.2d 482 Accordingly, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2e "has been construed to bar an action where an insurance company has paid its named insured the amount o......
-
Faulk v. Martucci, DOCKET NO. A-2234-19T1
...1266 Apartment Corp., 368 N.J. Super. at 459 (citing Sikes v. Twp. of Rockaway, 269 N.J. Super. 463, 465-66 (App. Div.), aff'd, o.b., 138 N.J. 41 (1994)); see Park Crest Cleaners, LLC v. A Plus Cleaners and Alterations Corporation, 458 N.J. Super. 465, 472 (App. Div. 2019) (noting that "a p......
-
L.L. v. M.V., DOCKET NO. A-2281-18T2
...did not raise the issue in his notice of appeal and he failed to file a relevant trial transcript with his appeal),Page 29 aff'd o.b., 138 N.J. 41 (1994); see also Nieder v. Royal Indem. Ins., 62 N.J. 229, 234 (1973) ("[A]ppellate courts will decline to consider questions or issues not prop......
-
Moody v. Voorhees Care & Rehab. Ctr., DOCKET NO. A-5561-18
...Div.) (holding that an issue raised in a brief but not designated in the notice of appeal was not properly before the court), aff'd o.b., 138 N.J. 41 (1994). See also Silviera-Francisco v. Bd. of Educ. of Elizabeth, 224 N.J. 126, 142 (2016)Page 29 (stating an order "clearly identified [in a......
Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
-
Pinkowski v. Township of Montclair
...the governmental entity. N.J.S.A. 59:9-2e; Sikes v. Township of Rockaway, 269 N.J.Super. 463, 466, 635 A.2d 1004 (App.Div.), aff'd, 138 N.J. 41, 648 A.2d 482 Accordingly, N.J.S.A. 59:9-2e "has been construed to bar an action where an insurance company has paid its named insured the amount o......
-
Faulk v. Martucci, DOCKET NO. A-2234-19T1
...1266 Apartment Corp., 368 N.J. Super. at 459 (citing Sikes v. Twp. of Rockaway, 269 N.J. Super. 463, 465-66 (App. Div.), aff'd, o.b., 138 N.J. 41 (1994)); see Park Crest Cleaners, LLC v. A Plus Cleaners and Alterations Corporation, 458 N.J. Super. 465, 472 (App. Div. 2019) (noting that "a p......
-
L.L. v. M.V., DOCKET NO. A-2281-18T2
...did not raise the issue in his notice of appeal and he failed to file a relevant trial transcript with his appeal),Page 29 aff'd o.b., 138 N.J. 41 (1994); see also Nieder v. Royal Indem. Ins., 62 N.J. 229, 234 (1973) ("[A]ppellate courts will decline to consider questions or issues not prop......
-
Moody v. Voorhees Care & Rehab. Ctr., DOCKET NO. A-5561-18
...Div.) (holding that an issue raised in a brief but not designated in the notice of appeal was not properly before the court), aff'd o.b., 138 N.J. 41 (1994). See also Silviera-Francisco v. Bd. of Educ. of Elizabeth, 224 N.J. 126, 142 (2016)Page 29 (stating an order "clearly identified [in a......
Request a trial to view additional results