Silha v. ACT, Inc.
| Docket Number | 15-1083 |
| Decision Date | 18 November 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
470 cases
-
McConchie v. Scholz
...element of standing. Id. (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) (alteration in original) (first quoting Silha v. ACT, Inc. , 807 F.3d 169, 173–74 (7th Cir. 2015) ; and then quoting Lujan , 504 U.S. at 561, 112 S.Ct. 2130 ).In their motions to dismiss and briefs in opposition to th......
-
Roberson v. Maestro Consulting Servs. LLC, Case No. 20-CV-00895-NJR
...to (1) properly state a claim, or (2) properly plead the elements of standing, courts apply the same analysis. See Silha v. ACT, Inc., 807 F.3d 169, 173 (7th Cir. 2015). The factual allegations contained within a complaint must "raise a right to relief above the speculative level, on the as......
-
Dinerstein v. Google, LLC, No. 19 C 4311
...at 5–6), arguing that Mr. Dinerstein has not adequately alleged a basis for standing in his amended complaint. Silha v. ACT, Inc. , 807 F.3d 169, 173 (7th Cir. 2015). In reviewing such a challenge, the court must accept all well-pleaded factual allegations as true and draw all reasonable in......
-
Reapers Hockey Ass'n, Inc. v. Amateur Hockey Ass'n Ill., Inc.
...subject matter jurisdiction exists." Apex Digital, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. , 572 F.3d 440, 444 (7th Cir. 2009) ; Silha v. ACT, Inc. , 807 F.3d 169, 173 (7th Cir. 2015). At least until the court is satisfied that it has the power to hear the case, "no presumptive truthfulness attaches t......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
2016 Class Action Year-End Review
...part of their premiums went toward paying for security measures, such a claim is too flimsy to support standing.”); Silha v. Act, Inc., 807 F.3d 169, 174-75 (7th Cir. 2015) (rejecting standing based on claimed overpayment where plaintiffs did not adequately plead “they lost anything of valu......