Silvers v. Silvers
| Decision Date | 27 September 1993 |
| Citation | Silvers v. Silvers, 603 N.Y.S.2d 764, 196 A.D.2d 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993) |
| Parties | Shelby SILVERS, Respondent, v. Ronald SILVERS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
David H. Perlman, Brooklyn, for appellant.
Del Seligman, New York City, for respondent.
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated December 9, 1986, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County(Morrison, J.), dated June 18, 1991, which denied his motion to correct or modify the ninth decretal paragraph of the judgment of divorce, which grants the former wife 50% of his entire pension, rather than 50% of the portion thereof which allegedly constitutes marital property.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The trial court on this motion to correct the judgment pursuant to CPLR 5019(a) did not have revisory or appellate jurisdiction to correct the purported error, as the proposed amendment would have affected a substantial right of the former wife (see, Blaustein v. Blaustein, 145 A.D.2d 591, 592, 536 N.Y.S.2d 468).Additionally, the error alleged by the appellant does not constitute grounds for relief under either CPLR 5015, or pursuant to the court's inherent power to exercise control over its judgments (see,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Levine v. Levine, 2009 NY Slip Op 32676(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 10/30/2009)
...95 A.D.2d 371, 380, 466 N.Y.S.2d 461; see also, Matter of Scalabrini v. Scalabrini, 242 A.D.2d 725, 662 N.Y.S.2d 581; Silvers v. Silvers, 196 A.D.2d 863, 603 N.Y.S.2d 764). "[T]o overcome the heavy presumption that a deliberately prepared and executed written instrument manifested the inten......
- Futerfas v. Shultis
- Santulli v. Drybka
-
Community Preservation v. City Terrace Assoc.
...right of the respondent. Therefore, the proposed amendment would have been improper (see Kiker v Nassau County, 85 N.Y.2d 879; Silvers v Silvers, 196 A.D.2d 863; Solomon v City of New York, 127 A.D.2d 827; Jakobleff v Jakobleff, 108 A.D.2d 725). In any event, the appellant is guilty of lach......