Simmons v. Carter

Decision Date04 January 1937
Docket Number34083
CitationSimmons v. Carter, 186 La. 377, 172 So. 425 (La. 1937)
CourtLouisiana Supreme Court
PartiesSIMMONS et al. v. CARTER et al

Rehearing Denied February 1, 1937

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; Cecil Morgan, Judge.

Petitory action by Mrs. Julia Crawford Simmons and others against Homer F. Carter and others. From a judgment maintaining an exception of no right or cause of action, plaintiffs appeal.

Affirmed.

C. F Currier and Malcolm W. Feist, both of Shreveport, for appellants.

Wilkinson Lewis & Wilkinson, of Shreveport, for appellees.

OPINION

FOURNET, Justice.

This is a petitory action to recover a small tract of land said to contain less than an acre, situated in the Rodessa Oil Field, Caddo parish, La.

Defendants excepted to plaintiffs' petition on the ground that it disclosed no right or cause of action. Counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for defendants agreed that: "For the purpose of this exception, and only for that purpose, the following facts shall be taken as true:

"1. On September 29th, 1890, Thomas R. Simmons, without record title in himself, conveyed the tract of land in dispute to John W. Law. This deed was filed for record October 10, 1891, in the Conveyance Records of Caddo Parish, Louisiana.

"2. On February 6th, 1893, William B. Spearman, without record title in himself, conveyed the tract to Thomas R. Simmons. This deed was filed for record February 7, 1893, in the Conveyance Records of Caddo Parish, La.

"3. On April 29, 1899, John W. Law conveyed the tract in dispute to William B. Spearman. This deed was filed for record May 1, 1899, in the Conveyance Records of Caddo Parish, Louisiana.

"4. All of the conveyances recited above were made by warranty deed.

"5. That the plaintiffs, being the widow and sole heirs of Thomas R. Simmons, have been recognized as such by the judgment of the First District Court of Caddo Parish, Louisiana, and claim the title to the land in dispute through inheritance from the said Thomas R. Simmons, and through the acquisition of said title by Thomas R. Simmons from William B. Spearman in the deed dated February 6th, 1893, and set forth above.

"6. That the defendants Homer Carter and Noah S. Carter are claiming through William B. Spearman by virtue of the deed dated April 29, 1899, they having accepted the Succession of their mother, Mrs. Tencie Spearman Carter, who had previously accepted the Succession of her father, the said William B. Spearman, and the other defendants claim through said Homer F. Carter and Noah S. Carter.

"7. Only the facts set forth in this stipulation, together with the allegations of the petition, shall be taken into consideration in passing upon the exception now before the court, and this agreement shall have no binding force or effect except for the purposes of the present exception. Should the present exception be overruled, either party hereto shall be at liberty to prove the facts to be otherwise than as herein set forth."

The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment of the lower court maintaining the exception of no right or cause of action.

" The settled jurisprudence of this state is that the title of the defendant in a petitory action is not at issue until the plaintiff has proved an apparently valid title in himself." Thomas & Bullis v. Stricker Land & Timber Co., Inc., 181 La. 784, 160 So. 413. See, also, Smith v. Chappell, 177 La. 311, 148 So. 242; Mecom v. Graves, 148 La. 369, 86 So. 917.

"It is elementary that in a petitory action plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of defendant's title." Bruton v. Braselton et al., 157 La. 63, 101 So. 873, 874; Code of Practice, art. 44.

But it is contended by plain...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Wier v. Texas Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana
    • August 18, 1948
    ...and defendant's title is not at issue until the plaintiffs have disclosed an apparent valid title in themselves. Simmons et al. v. Carter et al., 186 La. 377, 172 So. 425. On February 11, 1929, there was executed between E. B. Norman & Co. and The Texas Company an agreement (dubbed mutually......
  • Wier v. Texas Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 5, 1950
    ...F.2d 604. These being petitory actions, if plaintiffs are to recover it must be on the strength of their own titles. Simmons, et al., v. Carter, 186 La. 377, 172 So. 425; Cupples et al., v. Harris, 202 La. 336, 11 So.2d 609; Smyth v. New Orleans Canal & Banking Company, 5 Cir., 93 F. 899. H......
  • Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1947
    ... ... adversaries. Code of Practice, Article 43, 44; Dugas v ... Powell, 197 La. 409, 1 So.2d 677; Simmons v. Carter, 186 La ... 377, 172 So. 425 ... Plaintiffs' ... primary contention is that, since the land claimed is ... embraced within ... ...
  • Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Butler
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • January 6, 1958
    ...plaintiff has proven an apparently valid title in itself. Art. 44 La.Code Prac.; Mecom v. Graves, 148 La. 369, 86 So. 917; Simmons v. Carter, 186 La. 377, 172 So. 425; Simmons v. Jones, La.App., 68 So.2d Plaintiff here is the record owner of the property and has an unbroken chain of title b......
  • Get Started for Free