Simmons v. State, 6 Div. 336
Decision Date | 22 January 1985 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 336 |
Parties | Richard Allen SIMMONS v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Tim W. Bice, Bessemer, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Louis C. Colley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
The appellant, Richard Allen Simmons, was indicted for the offense of murder as proscribed by § 13A-6-2, Code of Alabama 1975. A jury found him guilty of the offense of criminally negligent homicide and Simmons was sentenced to twelve months' imprisonment.
For now, we pretermit discussion of the issues raised on appeal except the issue
of the circuit court's jurisdiction. Simmons contends that the testimony during his trial revealed that he was seventeen years old at the time of the alleged act giving rise to the charge. From our review of the record, we find conflicting testimony as to Simmons's age. If Simmons was, in fact, under the age of eighteen at the time of the alleged act, the lower court, under the following statute, was without authority to pronounce and enter the judgment and sentence:
Ala.Code 1975, § 12-15-33(a), (footnote added). Under the mandate of this statute, the trial court had the affirmative duty to determine the age of the defendant and, if such investigation disclosed that the defendant was under eighteen at the time of the alleged act, the child should have been transferred to the juvenile court. Cf. Keenum v. State, 25 Ala.App. 359, 146 So. 623 (1933); Hart v. State, 22 Ala.App. 135, 113 So. 471 (1927). We find in the record no factual determination of Simmons's age.
Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court with directions to ascertain, by proper evidence, Simmons's age at the time of the alleged act. The trial court shall make a written finding of fact on this single issue and forward this finding to this court for review.
All Judges concur.
ON RETURN TO REMAND
...
To continue reading
Request your trial