Simmons v. Zerbst
Decision Date | 22 March 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 1164.,1164. |
Citation | 18 F. Supp. 929 |
Parties | SIMMONS v. ZERBST, Warden. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia |
M. E. Kilpatrick, of Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner.
H. H. Tysinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Lawrence S. Camp, U. S. Atty., both of Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
Petitioner was indicted in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, for violation of the Fugitive Felony Act, approved May 18, 1934 (U.S.C., title 18, § 408e 18 U.S.C.A. § 408e). He entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to a term of two years in the penitentiary.
The pertinent parts of the act provide:
The indictment charges that petitioner' "Did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly move and travel in Interstate Commerce from Montezuma, within the Americus Division of the Middle District of Georgia, and within the jurisdiction of this court, to Huntington, in the State of West Virginia, with intent on the part of said Moochie Simmons, alias Freddie Burke, to avoid prosecution under the laws of the State of Georgia for the offense of burglary, which said offense was committed within the County of Macon, State of Georgia, on December 21, 1935, for that on said date the said Moochie Simmons, alias Freddie Burke, forcibly entered the home of Emmett Morgan, in the said city of Montezuma, County of Macon, State of Georgia, and then and there committed a burglary therein; contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the United States."
The indictment adequately charges a violation of the act; the prosecution was in the federal judicial district in which the original crime was alleged to have been committed, and the sentence upon the plea of guilty was within the limits provided by law. The writ, therefore, must be discharged unless the act is unconstitutional, as contended by petitioner.
If the transit of petitioner from the state of Georgia to the state of West Virginia was interstate commerce and the Fugitive Felony Act was a valid regulation thereof, then the act is constitutional and the writ should be discharged.
"Commerce * * * means something more than traffic, — it is intercourse; and the power committed to Congress to regulate commerce is exercised by prescribing rules for carrying on that intercourse." Lottery Case (Champion v. Ames), 188 U.S. 321, 348, 23 S.Ct. 321, 324, 47 L.Ed. 492.
It is under definitions like the above that such phenomena as purely social intercourse over telephone, telegraph, and radio, between citizens of different states (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U.S. 460, 26 L.Ed. 1067; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Milling Co., 218 U.S. 406, 31 S.Ct. 59, 54 L.Ed. 1088, 36 L.R.A.(N.S.) 220, 21 Ann.Cas. 815; and Fisher's Blend Station v. State Tax Commission, 297 U.S. 650, 56 S.Ct. 608, 80 L. Ed. 956), or the mere passage of persons for social intercourse or pleasure, over an interstate bridge (Covington, etc., Bridge Co., v. Kentucky, 154 U.S. 204, 218, 14 S.Ct. 1087, 38 L.Ed. 962), or the driving of sheep on foot from one state to another (Kelley v. Rhoads, 188...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
US v. Lewis
..."The passage of a person from one state to another is interstate commerce within the meaning of the Constitution ..." Simmons v. Zerbst, 18 F.Supp. 929, 930 (N.D.Ga.1937) (upholding constitutionality of Fugitive Felony Act). Moreover, the CSRA's jurisdictional element necessitates that a de......
-
Hemans v. United States
...which he flees as to a fugitive from justice. The constitutionality of the statute in controversy was also upheld in Simmons v. Zerbst, D.C.,N.D.Ga., 18 F.Supp. 929. In Barrow v. Owen, 5 Cir., 89 F.2d 476, 478, the district judge had inquired into and determined that the Fugitive Felon Act ......
-
U.S. v. McHugh
...under the Commerce Clause because, in order for it be invoked, the fleeing person had to cross state lines. Simmons v. Zerbst, 18 F.Supp. 929, 930 (N.D.Ga.1937). After stating, that "the passage of a person from one state to another is interstate commerce," the Simmons court noted that, wit......
-
Authority for the Removal of Fugitive Felons Apprehended Under 18 U.S.C. § 1073, 83-10
... ... 228 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 332 U.S. 801 (1947); ... United States v. Brandenburg, 144 F.2d 656 (2d Cir ... 1944); Simmons v. Zerbst, 18 F.Supp. 929 (N.D.Ga ... 1939). The "general purpose of the Act was to assist in ... the enforcement of state laws, " United States ... ...
-
Making parents pay: interstate child support enforcement after United States v. Lopez.
...when it involves interstate travel under 18 U.S.C. [sections] 1201 (1994)), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 218 (1993); Simmons V. Zerbst, 18 F. Supp. 929, 929-30 (N.D. Ga. 1937) (affirming Congress's Commerce Clause power to punish fugitives who travel from one state to another under the Fugitive......