Simon v. O'Toole

Citation158 A. 543
Decision Date01 February 1932
Docket NumberNo. 165.,165.
PartiesSolomon SIMON et al., Appellants v. Peter O'TOOLE et al., Respondents.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Merritt Lane and Herman W. Brams, both of Newark, for appellants.

Frank A. Boettner and Frederick H. Groel, both of Newark, and Charles B. Bradley, of Jersey City, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court, reported at (N. J.) 155 A. 449.

For affirmance: The CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices CAMPBELL, LLOYD, and BODINE, and Judges DEAR and WELLS.

For reversal: Justices PARKER and CASE, and Judges VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, and HETFIELD.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • City of Trenton v. Fowler-Thorne Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • September 10, 1959
    ... ... He certainly could not authorize construction of the building in the first instance. See Simon v. O'Toole, 108 N.J.L. 32, 44--46, 155 A. 449 (Sup.Ct.1931), affirmed, o.b., 108 N.J.L. 548, 158 A. 543 (E. & A.1931). That right is, moreover, ... ...
  • Kagan v. Caroselli
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1959
    ...applied to a Walsh Act municipality in Simon v. O'Toole, 108 N.J.L. 32, 155 A. 449 (Sup.Ct.1931), affirmed on opinion below 108 N.J.L. 549, 158 A. 543 (E. & A.1932). The broad proposition that 'governing body' should always be deemed to signify the department head under the commission form ......
  • New York City Hous. Auth. v. Muller
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • March 17, 1936
    ...the power to spend public funds for such projects was upheld. See, also, Simon v. O'Toole, 108 N.J.Law, 32, 155 A. 449, affirmed 108 N.J.Law, 549, 158 A. 543. In United States v. Certain Lands in City of Louisville, Jefferson County, Ky. (C.C.A.) 78 F.(2d) 684, it was held that while such a......
  • Slurzberg v. City of Bayonne
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • February 2, 1959
    ...conduct of the business of the municipality.' See Simon v. O'Toole, 108 N.J.L. 32, 155 A. 449, (Sup.Ct.1931), affirmed 108 N.J.L. 549, 158 A. 543 (E. & A.1932). And '(e)very resolution or ordinance,' R.S. 40:72--14, N.J.S.A., 'shall be reduced to writing and read before the vote is taken th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT