Simons v. Gregory

Decision Date14 March 1905
Citation85 S.W. 751,120 Ky. 116
PartiesSIMONS v. GREGORY et al.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County, Common Pleas Division.

"To be officially reported."

Action for personal injuries by Alme Simons against James P. Gregory and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

B. H Young, M. W. Ripy, F. T. Fox, S.W. Greene, T. R. McBeath, and J. C. Poston, for appellant.

Gibson Marshall & Gibson, for appellee Geiger, Fiske & Koop Co. Forcht & Field and O'Neal & O'Neal, for appellee Jefferson County and Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York. Kohn, Baird & Spindle and S.E. Sloss, for appellee J. R Pflanz. M. A., D. A. & J. G. Sachs, for appellee J. P. Shiveley.

HOBSON C.J.

Appellant was painfully injured by the fall of an elevator in the courthouse at Louisville while she was in the elevator as a passenger, and being carried from the fifth floor to the first. She instituted this action against the fiscal court of Jefferson county, Jefferson county, the Geiger, Fiske & Koop Company, the Fidelity & Casualty Company, the jailer of Jefferson county, and the county judge and justices personally. She alleged that the fiscal court had the elevator installed in the courthouse voluntarily, and without any legal duty on their part to do so; that they failed to have it constructed safely, and by gross negligence permitted it to be operated when out of order and controlled by inexperienced persons; that the Geiger, Fiske & Koop Company put in the elevator under contract with the fiscal court, and, by gross negligence, failed to make it safe; that the dangerous condition of the elevator was well known to the company, or could have been known to it by the exercise of ordinary care upon its part, but was unknown to her; that the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York had entered into a certain contract with the fiscal court of Jefferson county, which was in force at the time she was injured, by which it bound itself to the fiscal court to indemnify it and the county of Jefferson against any loss which it might sustain by reason of any accident or injury which might be sustained by any person on account of the elevator. The court sustained a demurrer to the petition. Thereupon the plaintiff amended her petition, reiterating her charges of gross negligence, alleging that for some time before she was hurt the elevator was in a dangerous condition, and that the members of the fiscal court and the jailer knew this, or by the exercise of ordinary care could have known it; that the fiscal court received the elevator, by gross negligence, from the Geiger, Fiske & Koop Company when it was in a dangerous condition; that the fiscal court was without authority to put an elevator in the courthouse, and that for some time before her injury the elevator, in its dangerous condition, was perilous to all persons having occasion to use it, and that this was known to the defendants, or could, by the exercise of ordinary care, have been known to them; that the operator of the elevator was grossly negligent and careless in its operation; and that the officers of Jefferson county referred to knew that he was an unfit person to have charge of it. The court sustained a demurrer to the petition as amended, and the plaintiff appeals.

1. As to Jefferson county, the fiscal court, the county judge, justices of the peace, and jailer, the ruling of the circuit court followed a long line of decisions of this court; the rule being in this state that neither the county, the fiscal court, nor county officers are liable to a person injured from defects in the county highways, bridges, or other structures which the county is by law required to maintain. Wheatly v. Mercer County, 72 Ky. 704; Moberley v. Carter County, 5 Ky. Law Rep. 694; Hite v. Whitley County Court, 91 Ky. 168, 15 S.W. 57, 11 L.R.A. 122; Sheppard v. Pulaski County, 18 S.W. 15, 13 Ky. Law Rep. 672; Downing v. Mason County, 87 Ky. 208, 8 S.W. 264, 12 Am.St.Rep. 473; Sinkhorn v. Lexington, etc. Co., 65 S.W. 356, 23 Ky. Law Rep. 1479; Hardwick v. Franklin, 85 S.W. 709, 27 Ky. Law Rep. -- The jailer is merely the custodian of the courthouse, and can no more be held responsible than the county judge or justices. We are earnestly asked to overrule the decisions referred to, but this we cannot do. The rule thus declared has been acquiesced in by the Legislature, in two revisions of the statute. By section 1840, Ky. St. 1903, the fiscal court has jurisdiction "to erect and keep in repair public buildings, secure a sufficient jail and a comfortable and convenient place for holding court at the county seat." The court must take judicial notice that the circuit court of Jefferson county is composed of six judges, and that Louisville is a city of the first class. It is alleged in the petition that the elevator fell from the fifth floor of the building to the basement. Some means of getting the people to the upper floors of such a building must be provided by the fiscal court, in the discharge of its duty to secure a comfortable and convenient place for holding court. In buildings as high as this, elevators are now in common use, and it was undoubtedly within the jurisdiction of the fiscal court to supply the courthouse with such conveniences as are used in this class of buildings. The demurrer to the petition admits as true its allegations of fact, but not its conclusions of law. On the facts admitted, the law must be determined by the court.

2. As to the Fidelity & Casualty Company, as its contract was only to indemnify the county and fiscal court against loss, no action can be maintained against it by the plaintiff where neither the county nor the fiscal court are liable to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
48 cases
  • Sutton v. Otis Elevator Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • 20 Abril 1926
    ... ... 1046 (Mich.) Griffin v ... Jackson Light Co., 87 N.W. 888; Roberts v. S. P ... Co., et al., 201 P. 958 (Cal.); Simons v. Gregory, et ... al., 85 S.W. 751 (Ky.) ... It ... appears to be well settled in all jurisdictions that where, ... after acceptance, ... ...
  • Tabler v. Wallace
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • 21 Noviembre 1985
    ... ... A 1905 case, Simons v. Gregory, 120 Ky. 116, 85 S.W. 751 (1905), is cited for the proposition that it was. However, this reads more into Simons v. Gregory than the ... ...
  • Mississippi Baptist Hospital v. Moore
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 3 Marzo 1930
    ... ... 679] 180 Ky. 331, 202 S.W. 874, ... L.R.A. 1918E, 647; Emery v. Jewish Hospital ... Association, 193 Ky. 400, 236 S.W. 577; Simons v ... Gregory, 120 Ky. 116, 85 S.W. 751, 27 Ky. Law Rep. 509; ... Levy v. Superior Court, 74 Cal.App. 171, 239 P ... 1100; Adams v. University ... ...
  • Jackson v. City of Owingsville
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 19 Octubre 1909
    ... ... Law Rep. 1617; ... Twyman's Adm'r v. City of Frankfort, 117 Ky ... 518, 78 S.W. 446, 25 Ky. Law Rep. 1620, 64 L.R.A. 572; ... Simons v. Gregory, 120 Ky. 116, 85 S.W. 751, 27 Ky ... Law Rep. 509; Ernst v. West Covington, 116 Ky. 850, ... 76 S.W. 1089, 25 Ky. Law Rep. 1027, 63 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT